From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3E52C43458 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 21:33:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:CC:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=2c+lUhPPYLxaQiIs4EyExmWvTn9RRCfjWpLbE0SmDW4=; b=oyDGyJ5vr8qyn8gN3Y00/mLR9Q 8CA6prJR87yLioJpDBe/d0520fa2oSpknV+NkDpcc8oRzs3y2M67gF5XrH95sz/IUkLVrSFah+oBm PuzPp+cOc8+uxmO65q8qfK+AAUiQKB3fc1ioepVK/gCJWiGwYGKa3GlHph/B0H0RF+XYoTd/5B56C D+T7EJmAXbgD1zaSgcKK5OPZZxFkeBjOd5LL+e8ZnFTal3X5TeQFsRAl/9dL1hsO9azizIPgkXYP6 1bfKlFZLP2iDqRDg1C25kd8xZ/y2qJLJjfOF0+LwfERohvmEWJZgbamuL6r19qGbi6/uZvxi0JQrM K9/H/Zzw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1whwMe-00000003hnl-25jw; Thu, 09 Jul 2026 21:33:00 +0000 Received: from mail-westus2azon11012071.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([52.101.48.71] helo=MW6PR02CU001.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1whwMb-00000003hnK-34il for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2026 21:32:59 +0000 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PMxepAryp6azLNKZE1lg8iR/1jAZoicIcEYe7DH7/pmsZXA6VtdIjGvnsH4gLfVM4azB3mRuSeuse0yfAeEBUSZYdFqb2u/XwSG0DvsPUPdkYTp+lqPK4afxo0jQ2oROUJSxNhFX+D6s7QQcr3F0FSYqi5Bquf9CHJ3pMAF6jHMMEYTqZ/lqAcRoVOwYzEFnvHyE+EYlx1ZDi4UAROpCbzqFmmC0O9jrxasz1N2Fpu/ZF8cJ2qk6rARWFZ9JyrZt9a9t4OGCwLANVZ6vstgoghF8Rg6fgAxiaOkopek0/29P02gEzGWDNIMl2FfSiFDPGBPWGiRFVYrUjDVNoqtULg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=2c+lUhPPYLxaQiIs4EyExmWvTn9RRCfjWpLbE0SmDW4=; b=Hog6U5SLZvQAG2rBNSE6kmt/0sUI3LLBjqnrVdzvWltVaD+TVlll7HrB1cepceikbdj6OljjlkcxAL32KNLg5oMDfv/xM+p0JjSXE+nN6MsxD7vODtNtnZJcFdJBFmAwNmhWwVT6IdNdF0qj0kPmX7YRJJb8VyJXbRLfxkj/XskOFsaERDkLOwjoy0rwPSJqe3m8WrrzZvoOKBLzHXM7gOxKaHeytrVBF/qd4lSEmO+9ziFaivpJ5kPsgI8A111weMOyLYSPC07OT7Nrzh6yEMp/N7ljn7wGUFbFgKbGAORzxWKDITx1CAVuKb64zgqLDoTDnVM1TIteGmo9hPIFDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 216.228.118.232) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.linux.dev smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dmarc=pass (p=reject sp=reject pct=100) action=none header.from=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none (0) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Nvidia.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=2c+lUhPPYLxaQiIs4EyExmWvTn9RRCfjWpLbE0SmDW4=; b=QOp2LOcHD9jRt1b/AaVoNgZSe74nvePB3STg2VVsSfxkIjulsxbMxIzg9nd3enS7yASHMhZLB6FzG3RnGFTd2Sz89xxqfIZJZk9MgGZ4cP3qPhwWeenvv8lNHeaCCAera3Mo5SCTjb+8ZVKoxuTnyEjxvg600e1kpxBTKGjcgIUhydyAnNgdhPzuNeVwApfOeuOhECgtaAUCT7k1TdKW2uOFlMwJ9eb4SBwWlOBkXA7nkqmU/9GTMg08XHUFfz02NZoQmMi/cRjaXEm9Z0iuj+clHfSdxJsxc6bg61N/UHRWGvfH+PsDJ6rQtB5uj1a6SBX1i68PVxiydCuh3TvQEg== Received: from PH3PEPF000040A1.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:518:1::52) by SN7PR12MB6931.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:261::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.21.181.16; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 21:32:43 +0000 Received: from CY4PEPF0000FCC0.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:f403:f910::1) by PH3PEPF000040A1.outlook.office365.com (2603:1036:903:49::3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.21.223.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 21:32:43 +0000 X-MS-Exchange-Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is 216.228.118.232) smtp.mailfrom=nvidia.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nvidia.com; Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates 216.228.118.232 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=216.228.118.232; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C Received: from mail.nvidia.com (216.228.118.232) by CY4PEPF0000FCC0.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.167.242.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.21.181.6 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 21:32:42 +0000 Received: from drhqmail203.nvidia.com (10.126.190.182) by mail.nvidia.com (10.127.129.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.43; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:32:22 -0700 Received: from drhqmail201.nvidia.com (10.126.190.180) by drhqmail203.nvidia.com (10.126.190.182) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:32:22 -0700 Received: from nvidia.com (10.127.8.10) by mail.nvidia.com (10.126.190.180) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.2562.20 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:32:21 -0700 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 14:32:19 -0700 From: Nicolin Chen To: Jason Gunthorpe CC: , "Joerg Roedel (AMD)" , Jean-Philippe Brucker , , Robin Murphy , Will Deacon , David Matlack , "Pasha Tatashin" , , "Pranjal Shrivastava" , Samiullah Khawaja , Mostafa Saleh Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Change how the tlbi describes the invalidation Message-ID: References: <0-v2-43074a57a53a+fb95-smmu_tlbi_jgg@nvidia.com> <7-v2-43074a57a53a+fb95-smmu_tlbi_jgg@nvidia.com> <20260709182559.GH422027@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260709182559.GH422027@nvidia.com> X-NV-OnPremToCloud: ExternallySecured X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: CY4PEPF0000FCC0:EE_|SN7PR12MB6931:EE_ X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 2ad62401-16f3-4e55-454b-08dede019c21 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-Relay: 0 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;ARA:13230040|82310400026|376014|7416014|1800799024|36860700016|23010399003|11063799006|4143699003|22082099003|56012099006|18002099003; X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: 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 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:216.228.118.232;CTRY:US;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:mail.nvidia.com;PTR:dc7edge1.nvidia.com;CAT:NONE;SFS:(13230040)(82310400026)(376014)(7416014)(1800799024)(36860700016)(23010399003)(11063799006)(4143699003)(22082099003)(56012099006)(18002099003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101; X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount: 1 X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0: YRJO9Wc+1/T7F3yFGWiUGWufyFJ4BLzfL0AsQWhve/y+9AVa3TG1n6qTdPCDgsR4CVMxMOFmv39F+TBQ3TQYntdeIjnerJt5q0i60bgDrcJTeJGgkD2cSCT/M2NbbwZt9r17ES3If7H3ysEQiSbs9COMVUBoM70MaRIt13C85ejH3tNjpj993ht24CRcDm/uGk8Qe5HuihBUgFjmQ4g0/mb2sfsLTYlee6fTPjFpIOCIs1pAMD9yD24nfjX9dv/OcS/5/upYcSQHiuLBG7s1MJuzCFkgNJz4fAqggRFWc3B37dQemlfI1Q4hhurlTLxrVL62c41UKlBXLYdwQwUaePPckQaZqbhoN2XKeYh6+Lltgv1dIZfoYDcPCDEUnl5IaykY3duwb3L1ETHDf9O+IG9A2uesYmingTSfc8+TiIORrlpJtxL+ZFhq1SgxxRY0 X-OriginatorOrg: Nvidia.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2026 21:32:42.7592 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 2ad62401-16f3-4e55-454b-08dede019c21 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.118.232];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CY4PEPF0000FCC0.namprd03.prod.outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN7PR12MB6931 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260709_143257_772019_B32D1666 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.81 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jul 09, 2026 at 03:25:59PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > I wonder if this Claude was thinking about a kernel before > 84b2baf427968c1 where this flow would have been as-described? You are right! I applied the patches on 7.2-rc1, but somehow AI was still relying on the old code. I had a some hard time to fully get it.. > With the kernel today the arm_smmu_tlb_inv_walk() is supposed to clear > out the walk cache before freeing the table entry and the gather is > supposed to clear out the leaf entries themselves. 84b2baf427968c1 > changed things so we always have a second leaf-only gather that covers > the entire unmap range, which also introduced the double invalidation. IIUIC, for the "double invalidation", the driver currently flushes: 1. tlb_flush_walk(iova, size=2M, granule=4K, leaf-only=false) // flush both walk cache and leaf entries 2.iommu_iotlb_sync((iova, size=2M, granule=2M, leaf-only=true) // flush the 1st leaf entry only > What I missed is that because of that commit gather->pgsize is no > longer correct, it will be 2M even if __arm_lpae_free_pgtable() > unmapped 4k leaves. So we will still miss leaf invalidation :\ This also makes sense to me. > > > + * If leaf_levels_bitmap is 0 then this is a walk cache only > > > + * invalidation. > > [...] > > > + u8 leaf_levels_bitmap; > > > > Or is that only to implement a walkcache-only invalidation, such > > that the leaf entries will have separate invalidation call(s)? > > That was the plan I see the full picture now. Thanks Nicolin