From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
William Breathitt Gray <wbg@kernel.org>,
Damon Ding <damon.ding@rock-chips.com>,
kernel@collabora.com, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
Alexey Charkov <alchark@gmail.com>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: pwm: Add a new binding for rockchip,rk3576-pwm
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 12:31:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alCvmLX1ke0qjh99@monoceros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260420-rk3576-pwm-v5-1-ae7cfbbe5427@collabora.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3307 bytes --]
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 03:52:38PM +0200, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> The Rockchip RK3576 SoC has a newer PWM controller IP revision than
> previous Rockchip SoCs. This IP, called "PWMv4" by Rockchip, introduces
> several new features, and consequently differs in its bindings.
>
> Instead of expanding the ever-growing rockchip-pwm binding that already
> has an if-condition, add an entirely new binding to handle this.
>
> There are two additional clocks, "osc" and "rc". These are available for
> every PWM instance, and the PWM hardware can switch between the "pwm",
> "osc" and "rc" clock at runtime.
>
> The PWM controller also comes with an interrupt now. This interrupt is
> used to signal various conditions.
>
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/pwm/rockchip,rk3576-pwm.yaml | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> MAINTAINERS | 7 ++
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/rockchip,rk3576-pwm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/rockchip,rk3576-pwm.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..48d5055c8b06
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/rockchip,rk3576-pwm.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pwm/rockchip,rk3576-pwm.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Rockchip PWMv4 controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + The Rockchip PWMv4 controller is a PWM controller found on several Rockchip
> + SoCs, such as the RK3576.
> +
> + It supports both generating and capturing PWM signals.
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: pwm.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + items:
> + - const: rockchip,rk3576-pwm
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + items:
> + - description: Used to derive the PWM signal.
> + - description: Used as the APB bus clock.
> + - description: Used as an alternative to derive the PWM signal.
> + - description: Used as another alternative to derive the PWM signal.
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: pwm
> + - const: pclk
> + - const: osc
> + - const: rc
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + "#pwm-cells":
> + const: 3
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - clocks
> + - clock-names
> + - interrupts
pwm.yaml has:
required:
- "#pwm-cells"
Still Sashiko[1] claims:
The binding defines #pwm-cells under properties, but omitting it from the
required list allows device tree nodes missing the property to pass schema
validation.
I played a bit around with dt-validate and I think Sashiko is wrong here
and pwm.yaml's requirement isn't overridden by the local required list.
So this patch should be fine.
Best regards
Uwe
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260420-rk3576-pwm-v5-0-ae7cfbbe5427%40collabora.com
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 13:52 [PATCH v5 0/6] Add Rockchip RK3576 PWM Support Through MFPWM Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-04-20 13:52 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: pwm: Add a new binding for rockchip,rk3576-pwm Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-07-10 10:31 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2026-04-20 13:52 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mfd: Add Rockchip mfpwm driver Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-05-14 11:41 ` Lee Jones
2026-05-20 15:38 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-04-20 13:52 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] pwm: Add rockchip PWMv4 driver Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-04-26 9:44 ` Damon Ding
2026-04-26 13:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-04-27 1:20 ` Damon Ding
2026-04-26 10:09 ` Damon Ding
2026-07-10 11:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-04-20 13:52 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] counter: Add rockchip-pwm-capture driver Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-04-26 10:55 ` Damon Ding
2026-04-27 17:35 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-05-03 11:06 ` William Breathitt Gray
2026-05-03 10:46 ` William Breathitt Gray
2026-05-04 8:25 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-04-20 13:52 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: add PWM nodes to RK3576 SoC dtsi Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-04-26 7:30 ` Damon Ding
2026-04-20 13:52 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add cooling fan to ROCK 4D Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-04-26 7:23 ` Damon Ding
2026-04-27 17:17 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-04-21 15:56 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Add Rockchip RK3576 PWM Support Through MFPWM Jonathan Cameron
2026-04-22 11:31 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2026-04-24 10:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alCvmLX1ke0qjh99@monoceros \
--to=ukleinek@kernel.org \
--cc=alchark@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=damon.ding@rock-chips.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=wbg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox