Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	joro@8bytes.org, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] iommufd: Fix vDEVICE allocation lifecycle bugs
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 14:20:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alZFuwNz0RCcqawZ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1783311134.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>

On Sun, Jul 05, 2026 at 10:36:08PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Sashiko flagged a few bugs in how IOMMU_VDEVICE_ALLOC creates and validates
> a vDEVICE on a vIOMMU:
> 
>  - the core publishes a vDEVICE into the vIOMMU xarray before the driver's
>    vdevice_init() runs, so a concurrent invalidation can reach one it has
>    not yet accepted;
>  - the undersized-vdevice_size guard returns holding the igroup mutex,
>    deadlocking later vDEVICE operations on that group;
>  - the Arm SMMUv3 vIOMMU accepts a device without exactly one Stream ID:
>    an out-of-bounds streams[] read for none, stale ATC/IOTLB for several.
> 
> Fix each of them properly.
> 
> This is on Github:
> https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/fix_vdevice_sashiko-v2
> 
> Changelog
> v2
>  * Add "Reviewed-by" from Kevin
>  * Patch-2: Add "Cc stable"; drop the out_release label by inlining the
>    xa_release() call
>  * Patch-2: Note that the reserved slot is hidden only via xa_* helpers
>  * Patch-3: Return -EOPNOTSUPP instead of -EINVAL
> v1
>  https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1782767110.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com/
> 
> Nicolin Chen (3):
>   iommufd/viommu: Release the igroup lock on the vdevice_size error path
>   iommufd/viommu: Publish a vDEVICE only after vdevice_init() succeeds
>   iommu/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd: Require exactly one Stream ID for a vDEVICE
> 
>  .../arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c     | 15 +++++++++++++
>  drivers/iommu/iommufd/viommu.c                | 22 ++++++++++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>

Thanks,
Praan


      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-14 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  5:36 [PATCH v2 0/3] iommufd: Fix vDEVICE allocation lifecycle bugs Nicolin Chen
2026-07-06  5:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iommufd/viommu: Release the igroup lock on the vdevice_size error path Nicolin Chen
2026-07-06  5:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iommufd/viommu: Publish a vDEVICE only after vdevice_init() succeeds Nicolin Chen
2026-07-06 17:23   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06 18:05     ` Nicolin Chen
2026-07-06 19:47       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-06  5:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd: Require exactly one Stream ID for a vDEVICE Nicolin Chen
2026-07-14 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] iommufd: Fix vDEVICE allocation lifecycle bugs Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-14 14:23   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-07-14 14:20 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alZFuwNz0RCcqawZ@google.com \
    --to=praan@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox