From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aaro.koskinen@iki.fi (Aaro Koskinen) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [PATCHv22 13/16] drivers: add Contiguous Memory Allocator In-Reply-To: <1329507036-24362-14-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> References: <1329507036-24362-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <1329507036-24362-14-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > +/** > + * dma_release_from_contiguous() - release allocated pages > + * @dev: Pointer to device for which the pages were allocated. > + * @pages: Allocated pages. > + * @count: Number of allocated pages. > + * > + * This function releases memory allocated by dma_alloc_from_contiguous(). > + * It returns false when provided pages do not belong to contiguous area and > + * true otherwise. > + */ > +bool dma_release_from_contiguous(struct device *dev, struct page *pages, > + int count) > +{ > + struct cma *cma = dev_get_cma_area(dev); > + unsigned long pfn; > + > + if (!cma || !pages) > + return false; > + > + pr_debug("%s(page %p)\n", __func__, (void *)pages); > + > + pfn = page_to_pfn(pages); > + > + if (pfn < cma->base_pfn || pfn >= cma->base_pfn + cma->count) > + return false; > + > + VM_BUG_ON(pfn + count > cma->base_pfn); Are you sure the VM_BUG_ON() condition is correct here? > + mutex_lock(&cma_mutex); > + bitmap_clear(cma->bitmap, pfn - cma->base_pfn, count); > + free_contig_range(pfn, count); > + mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex); > + > + return true; > +} A.