From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: julia.lawall@lip6.fr (Julia Lawall)
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 08:38:45 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCH] drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c: fix usage of devm functions
In-Reply-To: <1345617275.1895.83.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
References: <1344069330-29569-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
 <1345608994.1895.73.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
 <CAGsJ_4yjzE3eNGz=AA7gGxGNkjBH8bKRAUsYXcG+A1p8PtOQPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208220729440.1966@localhost6.localdomain6>
 <CAGsJ_4wkyY7VkrgMwGwmFF4kpGiGEtU8Ox46G-yOspAi27Lqgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1345617275.1895.83.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1208220837480.1966@localhost6.localdomain6>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

>> dmaengine: sirf: .............
> That is the usual way, it helps if you see the notation used by
> subsystem by checking patches being sent to subsystem, but it is not a
> really big deal, pls take care of this in future.

OK.

julia