From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: paul@pwsan.com (Paul Walmsley) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Subject: arm64: USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI In-Reply-To: <1422478839.3621.34.camel@x220> References: <1422351833.14015.20.camel@x220> <1422438405.5666.16.camel@x220> <1422478839.3621.34.camel@x220> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Paul, On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:25 +0000, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Is the Kconfig checker script you mentioned on Tuesday available in the > > mainline tree? I don't see anything obvious under the "Static Analysers" > > section of the Makefile, but perhaps I'm overlooking it. > > No, it's not. > > In tree you'll find scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py. That catches over > 90% of the stuff my local script catches, in less than 10% of runtime. > It would certainly have caught your use of USB_ARCH_HAS_EHCI. OK great, I'll add that to my static analysis scripts. > My local script is my third (or fourth) attempt at a script that checks > these kind of issues. I've used it on linux-next since for about 3/4 of > a year now. While doing that I ran into people that are planning into > adding similar, but far more advanced, functionality into one of the > bots that is checking linux. So I never bothered making my script > public. (I'm not sure what the status of those plan is now.) > > In the mean time I'll keep on checking linux-next with my script. That > should also help to see what problems an actual bot could run into, for > the benefit of those people. That sounds good; it's a very useful service you're providing. > Problems like: > - should it check each commit (I think it should only check releases); > - should it be a true bot (I think it needs a wetware frontend to > filter out non-issues). > > Hope this answers your question. It does. Thanks for the detailed response. - Paul