From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com (Stefano Stabellini) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 14:40:31 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v11 3/5] arm: introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING and pv_time_ops In-Reply-To: <564F2FD0.6040905@codeaurora.org> References: <1446737696-9749-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <564F2FD0.6040905@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, Christopher Covington wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 11/20/2015 09:31 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >>> Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING on ARM. > >>> > >>> The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so no > >>> runtime pvops patching needed. > >>> > >>> This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen > >>> ticks accounting. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > >>> Acked-by: Christopher Covington > >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell > >>> CC: linux at arm.linux.org.uk > >>> CC: will.deacon at arm.com > >>> CC: nico at linaro.org > >>> CC: marc.zyngier at arm.com > >>> CC: cov at codeaurora.org > >>> CC: arnd at arndb.de > >>> CC: olof at lixom.net > >> > >> > >> Russell, > >> are you OK with this patch? > > > > Russell, > > > > I am going to drop this patch and add a small #ifdef to > > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c to be able to use this functionality on arm64. > > > > If you change your mind let me know. > > It appears to me as though he's not copied on this message. He was. He is now in To:.