From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 21:07:06 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [PATCH V3 3/3] mfd: palmas: Add support for optional wakeup
In-Reply-To: <20140919195738.GR14505@atomide.com>
References: <1411067086-16613-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
 <1411067086-16613-4-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1409181749170.4206@nanos> <20140919030333.GA6088@kahuna>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1409190710320.5612@nanos> <20140919161927.GA28613@kahuna>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1409191027330.5612@nanos>
 <20140919191649.GQ14505@atomide.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1409191233590.4213@nanos>
 <20140919195738.GR14505@atomide.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1409192100380.23826@nanos>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> [140919 12:47]:
> > Why on earth are you wanting tasklets in there? That's just silly,
> > really.
> 
> Lack of a framework on driver side to cope with this in a generic
> way? :p

So instead of creating such a thing we rather have a completely ass
backward workaround which spreads itself all over the tree?

You SoC folks really need a quarterly sanity check.

Thanks,

	tglx