From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 19:37:00 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCH v8 1/2] irqchip: imx-gpcv2: IMX GPCv2 driver for wakeup sources In-Reply-To: References: <1438378439-11569-1-git-send-email-shenwei.wang@freescale.com> <1438378439-11569-2-git-send-email-shenwei.wang@freescale.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 24 Aug 2015, Shenwei Wang wrote: > > > +static int gpcv2_wakeup_source_save(void) { > > > + struct gpcv2_irqchip_data *cd; > > > + void __iomem *reg; > > > + int i; > > > + > > > + cd = imx_gpcv2_instance; > > > + if (!cd) > > > + return 0; > > > + > > > + for (i = 0; i < IMR_NUM; i++) { > > > + reg = cd->gpc_base + cd->cpu2wakeup + i * 4; > > > + cd->enabled_irqs[i] = readl_relaxed(reg); > > > > You read the full state of the register and restore the full state. So why > > enabled_irqs? > > There are two user scenarios: > In CPU Idle state, the system need to be woke up by any enabled > irqs, not just the ones that marked as wakeup sources. > In Suspend State, they system will only be woke up by the one that > marked as a wakeup source. Enabled_irqs are used to save the values > before suspend, and restore them after resume. That's what you want achieve. Still you save the full content of the registers and restore the full content. That saves/restores the enabled and disabled interrupts. So enabled_irqs is a misnomer as you save the full state. > > > + writel_relaxed(cd->wakeup_sources[i], reg); > > > + } > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > + > > > +static void gpcv2_wakeup_source_restore(void) { > > > + struct gpcv2_irqchip_data *cd; > > > + void __iomem *reg; > > > + int i; > > > + > > > + cd = imx_gpcv2_instance; > > > + if (!cd) > > > + return; > > > + > > > + for (i = 0; i < IMR_NUM; i++) { > > > + reg = cd->gpc_base + cd->cpu2wakeup + i * 4; > > > + writel_relaxed(cd->enabled_irqs[i], reg); > > > + cd->wakeup_sources[i] = ~0; > > > > Why are you clearing that info on resume? Drivers will clear that via > > set_wake() or leave it when they want to have resume functionality? > > > Each time system goes into the suspend state, it will call set_wake > (ON) again to configure the wakeup sources. Clearing wakeup_sources > here can make sure the system work as expected no matter that a > driver calls set_wake (OFF) during resume stage. We rather make sure that the drivers call set_wake(OFF) as they are supposed to, because if they do not then the set_wake(ON) logic in the core code will see the counter != 0 and not invoke the irq callback. Thanks, tglx