public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/3] initialize each mbigen device node as a interrupt controller.
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 11:54:49 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510111150270.6097@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151010110942.52d34a4b@arm.com>

On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 17:01:32 +0800
> "majun (F)" <majun258@huawei.com> wrote:
> > But there is a problem If i make the structure like you said.
> > 
> > For example, my hardware structure likes below:
> > 
> > uart ------> mbigen --> ITS-pMSI --> ITS --> GIC
> >      virq1
> > 
> > virq1 means the virq number allocted by irq_of_parse_and_map() function
> > when system parse the uart dts node in initializing  stage.
> > 
> > To create a ITS device, I need to call msi_domain_alloc_irqs() function
> > in my mbigen alloc function.
> > 
> > In this function, a new virq number(named as virq2 ) which different from
> > virq1 is allocated.
> > So, this is a big problem.
> 
> I think I see what your problem is:
> - The wired interrupt (uart -> mbigen) is allocated through DT (and
>   must be available early, because of of_platform_populate),
> - The MSI (mgigen -> ITS) is dynamic (and allocated much later,
>   because the device model kicks in after irqchip init, and we cannot
>   allocate MSIs without a device).

Why do we need that wired interrupt at all? 

We can make mbigen the 'msi-parent' of the device and let the
msi_domain_ops::msi_prepare() callback figure out the actual wiring
through device->fwnode.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-11  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-30  9:39 [PATCH v5 0/3] Support Mbigen interrupt controller MaJun
2015-09-30  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] initialize each mbigen device node as a " MaJun
2015-09-30 21:37   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-04  7:22     ` majun (F)
2015-10-09 13:47       ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-10  9:01         ` majun (F)
2015-10-10 10:09           ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-11  9:54             ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2015-10-11 11:03               ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-11 16:45                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-13  6:32                   ` majun (F)
2015-10-13  6:55                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14  8:16                       ` majun (F)
2015-10-14  8:20                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14  8:54                           ` majun (F)
2015-10-14  8:55                   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-10-14  9:17                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-14  9:49                       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-09-30  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] Probe mbigen chip and initial mbigen device as platform device MaJun
2015-09-30  9:39 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] dt-binding:Documents of the mbigen bindings MaJun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.11.1510111150270.6097@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox