From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 20:57:11 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCH v3 2/9] drivers: irqchip: Add STM32 external interrupts support In-Reply-To: <1472830398-13275-3-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@st.com> References: <1472830398-13275-1-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@st.com> <1472830398-13275-3-git-send-email-alexandre.torgue@st.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Alexandre, On Fri, 2 Sep 2016, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: This all looks very reasonable. The only complaint I have is your variable declaration ordering or the lack thereof. 1) > + struct irq_domain *domain = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc); > + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = domain->gc->gc[0]; > + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc); > + unsigned long pending; > + int n; 2) > + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > + u32 rtsr, ftsr; > + int pin = data->hwirq; 3) > + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > + int pin = data->hwirq; > + u32 emr; 4) > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq; > + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data; > + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = d->gc->gc[0]; 5) > + int nr_irqs, nr_exti, ret, i; > + unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN; > + struct irq_domain *domain; > + struct irq_chip_generic *gc; > + void *base; #1 and 3 have the ordering which is preferred in the irq code. #2, #4 and #5 are three permutations which are way harder to read. > + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data); > + int pin = data->hwirq; > + u32 rtsr, ftsr; > + struct irq_chip_generic *gc = d->gc->gc[0]; > + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec = data; > + irq_hw_number_t hwirq; > + unsigned int clr = IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOAUTOEN; > + int nr_irqs, nr_exti, ret, i; > + struct irq_chip_generic *gc; > + struct irq_domain *domain; > + void *base; Can you spot the difference? Thanks, tglx