Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] irqchip/bcm2836: Prevent spurious interrupts
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 21:55:03 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610282141030.5053@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bmy4qxnb.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net>

On Fri, 28 Oct 2016, Eric Anholt wrote:

> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> >> From: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>
> >> 
> >> The old arch-specific IRQ macros included a dsb to ensure the

Which old arch-specific macros?

> >> write to clear the mailbox interrupt completed before returning
> >> from the interrupt.

That's not what the patch does. It makes sure that the interrupt it cleared
_before_ the IPI handler is called.

> >> The BCM2836 irqchip driver needs the same precaution to avoid
> >> spurious interrupts.

Please describe issues proper. Something like this:

  The interrupt demultiplexer code clears a pending mailbox interrupt by
  writing the pending bit back to the hardware, but it does not ensure that
  the write is completed before proceeding. This causes the machine to
  catch fire and scares my cat. <<-- Replace by a proper description.

  The write() macro which was used, when the driver was developed,
  contained the necessary data sycnhronization barrier, but it was replaced
  by writel() when the driver got merged without adding the explicit
  barrier after the write.

  Add and document the barrier.

Can you spot the difference?

>  		writel(1 << ipi, mailbox0);

		/* Barriers need to be documented with a comment */

> +		dsb(sy);
> 		handle_IPI(ipi, regs);

> > This is missing a fixes tag. I have no idea when that problem was
> > introduced, so I have no way to decide whether this needs to be tagged
> > stable or not.
> 
> This code has been there since introduction of the driver, so:
> 
> Fixes: 1a15aaa998dc ("irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2")

So it want's a stable tag, right?
 
Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-28 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-27 18:20 [PATCH v2] irqchip/bcm2836: Prevent spurious interrupts Eric Anholt
2016-10-28 11:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-28 15:52   ` Eric Anholt
2016-10-28 19:55     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2016-10-31 17:58       ` Eric Anholt
2016-10-31 18:16         ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1610282141030.5053@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox