public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clocksource: add __ro_after_init to cyclecounter
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 19:56:41 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1702121956010.3734@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOH+1jEg4ZyrAvGxK51XDQGJ1XErAnKCCqgkG=EJaaGmntQMkw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017, Bhumika Goyal wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 11 February 2017 at 19:20, Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The object cyclecounter of type cyclecounter is not getting modified
> >> after getting initialized by arch_counter_register. Apart from
> >> initialization in arch_counter_register it is also passed as an argument
> >> to the function timecounter_init but this argument is of type const.
> >> Therefore, add __ro_after_init to its declaration.
> >>
> >
> > I think adding __ro_after_init is fine if this struct is never
> > modified after init. But the reference in the commit log to the
> > constness of the timecounter_init() argument  makes no sense: that
> > only means timecounter_init() will not modify the object, which allows
> > pointers to const objects to be passed to it as well. The opposite is
> > not true, though: there is no requirement whatsoever that objects
> > passed into const pointer arguments should be const themselves.
> >
> >
> 
> Yes, true. I will change the commit log and send a v2. Thanks for explaining.

I've applied it already and fixed up the subject/changelog. You should have
mail from tip-bot ...

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-12 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-11 19:20 [PATCH] clocksource: add __ro_after_init to cyclecounter Bhumika Goyal
2017-02-11 20:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-02-11 20:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-12 18:20   ` Bhumika Goyal
2017-02-12 18:56     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-02-12 19:00       ` Bhumika Goyal
2017-02-12 20:07       ` Daniel Lezcano
2017-02-11 20:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-02-12 18:21   ` Bhumika Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1702121956010.3734@nanos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox