From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner) Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2017 10:15:32 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [PATCH v3 00/18] clocksource/arch_timer: Errata workaround infrastructure rework In-Reply-To: References: <20170404171826.25030-1-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20170406162714.GC7705@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 6 Apr 2017, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 06/04/2017 18:27, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > Are you happy to take the arch_timer patches above? If yes, Marc can > > create a common branch with the first 5 patches which I will merge in > > the arm64 tree. You can then pull the whole series into your tree. > > Hi Catalin, > > I'm fine with the merge process you are proposing. But before going > forward, I would like to wait a bit in order to give the opportunity to > Thomas to review the patchset. I'm fine with that. It's sad that we need to have a workaround framework for dealing with this, but silicon tinkerers seem to compete on providing the most broken implementation of an _architected_ timer. Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner