From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:27:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [PATCH] ARM: abstract atags parsing In-Reply-To: References: <20100923213113.GC26295@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 05:18:02PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > >> This code movement will make it cleaner and easier to introduce support > >> for device tree which is basically an alternative to atags. No functional > >> changes are introduced by this patch. > > > > I don't see any point to this churn. > > I can carry it in test-devicetree branch until you become okay with it. That is probably the best course of action. I thought this was a nice cleanup that could stand on its own, but if RMK doesn't want it without a bigger reason (e.g. full DT implementation) then it is best if you carry it in your repository. Nicolas