From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] ARM: nmk: update GPIO chained IRQ handler to use EOI in parent chip
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:10:20 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1103021806560.2701@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001301cbd8ef$29403c10$7bc0b430$@deacon@arm.com>
On Wed, 2 Mar 2011, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > Can you please take the time and explain me the difference of the
> > following:
> >
> > irqchip1.c
> >
> > struct irq_chip1;
> >
> > handle_primary_irq(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> > {
> > chip->irq_ack();
> > desc->demux();
> > }
> >
> > init()
> > {
> > irq_set_chip(PRIMARY_IRQ, &irq_chip1);
> > irq_set_primary_handler(PRIMARY_IRQ, handle_primary_irq);
> > }
>
> I think with this approach you get the exact opposite problem; that
> is the primary irq_chip doesn't know which IRQs are going to be
> demuxed so it cannot know at init time which IRQs need their primary
> handler set. Is the idea that you set_primary_handler for all IRQs,
> stash that in the descriptor somewhere and then replace handle_irq
> with the primary handler when a demux handler is registered?
>
> I guess I'm missing something here,
No, I missed that. Darn, yes this would need storing the
primary_handler in some separate pointer or having a callback into the
chip implementation to make this fully distangled.
Grmbl.
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-02 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-28 13:33 [PATCH v2 0/6] Migrate GIC to fasteoi flow control Will Deacon
2011-02-28 13:33 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: gic: use handle_fasteoi_irq for SPIs Will Deacon
2011-02-28 13:33 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: omap: update GPIO chained IRQ handler to use EOI in parent chip Will Deacon
2011-02-28 13:33 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: tegra: " Will Deacon
2011-03-01 13:11 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-03-01 13:24 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-28 13:33 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: s5pv310: update IRQ combiner " Will Deacon
2011-03-01 13:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-02-28 13:33 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: msm: update GPIO chained IRQ handler " Will Deacon
2011-02-28 13:33 ` [PATCH 6/6] ARM: nmk: " Will Deacon
2011-02-28 14:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-28 18:09 ` Will Deacon
2011-02-28 19:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-28 21:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-01 10:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-01 20:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-01 21:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-01 23:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-01 23:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-01 23:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-02 8:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-02 9:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-02 19:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-03-02 20:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-03-02 15:33 ` Will Deacon
2011-03-02 17:10 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-03-04 11:47 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1103021806560.2701@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox