From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:54:30 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: mxc: don't allow to compile together i.MX51 and i.MX53 In-Reply-To: <20110412212050.GF18850@pengutronix.de> References: <1302464943-20721-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <1302464943-20721-4-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20110411074041.GF18601@pengutronix.de> <20110412095446.GB18850@pengutronix.de> <20110412202734.GB7806@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110412203730.GE18850@pengutronix.de> <20110412205344.GE7806@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110412212050.GF18850@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, 12 Apr 2011, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > Apart from defining PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET these symbols are used in the > machine files to define .boot_params. This is better than repeating the > bare numbers, isn't it? Sure. > The current arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/memory.h looks ok for me. I > assume you concur? Maybe you should replace CONFIG_RUNTIME_PHYS_OFFSET with CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT in that file. Nicolas