From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 02:14:13 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Make sure appended device tree data won't overlap kernel BSS In-Reply-To: <20110513112120.GO31483@atomide.com> References: <20110429102623.GX3755@atomide.com> <20110429135334.GR5126@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110504072317.GU2092@atomide.com> <20110509111929.GA11410@atomide.com> <20110509144949.GE30958@atomide.com> <20110512125952.GN31483@atomide.com> <20110513112120.GO31483@atomide.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 13 May 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > From: Tony Lindgren > Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 05:29:49 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: zImage: Make sure appended device tree data won't overlap kernel BSS > > Do this before relocating the compressed kernel + device tree data. > Otherwise we would have to split the copying into two parts, or copy > the device tree data twice. > > As we only have one register available, pass the size of kernel BSS > via linker and do the calculation using r1, then save it to the stack. > > Note that this patch now makes the stack also usable earlier for > CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB. > > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren [...] Please tell me what you think of this alternative: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/120182 I think it is a cleaner solution. Nicolas