From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:59:35 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [PATCH 07/52] ARM: mach-ep93xx: convert boot_params to atag_offset In-Reply-To: References: <1309920457-21913-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <1309920457-21913-7-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Tuesday, July 05, 2011 7:47 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/adssphere.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/edb93xx.c | 16 ++++++++-------- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/gesbc9312.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/micro9.c | 8 ++++---- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/simone.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/snappercl15.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/ts72xx.c | 2 +- > > 7 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > For ep93xx, this appears to be dependant on your patch: > > [PATCH 10/37] ARM: mach-ep93xx: remove mach/memory.h and Kconfig selection of SDRAM bank Actually this should be the other way around: this is a prerequisite for the removal patch, but this should only depend on the first patch (1/52) of the series. > Please make sure that the merge order of these patches does not > break anything... Obviously. I'm carrying them linearly in the same branch because of the ordering dependencies. > Other than that, for the ep93xx part. > > Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten Is this valid for both patches? Thanks Nicolas