From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 22:44:22 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [PATCH 01/52] ARM: introduce atag_offset to replace boot_params In-Reply-To: References: <1309920457-21913-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <20110708203634.GU4812@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110712204814.GD15997@ibawizard.net> <20110715064853.GE15997@ibawizard.net> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 15 Jul 2011, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:49 PM, Petr ?tetiar wrote: > > H Hartley Sweeten [2011-07-12 16:39:47]: > > > >> Could you rebuild your kernel with MACH_EDB9307A also selected in your > >> config? After verifying that it still boots please either send me the zImage > >> or place it somewhere I can grab it and I will make sure it boots on mine. > > > > Verified, kernel[1,2] boots. Source tree[3] used to build it (including config etc). > > > > 1. http://ynezz.true.cz/redux/zImage > > 2. http://ynezz.true.cz/redux/zImage.md5sum > > 3. https://github.com/ynezz/linux-2.6/commits/test-redux > > Well... Partial success... > > The kernel does boot, but then panic's when trying to mount the root fs. > > All my development boards are setup to pull the rootfs from a tftp server > and then use root=/dev/ram as the rootfs. This kernel must be missing something > for that to work. > > Regardless, the kernel _does_ boot so the phys offset is correctly being > worked out at run-time and the memory configuration looks correct so the > atags offset must be working. > > So, as far as the ep39xx goes, for this patchset you can have either of these: > > Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten > > Tested-by: H Hartley Sweeten Thanks a lot for the testing. This validates the basic concept. Nicolas