From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:58:53 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Pull request: removal of most instances of mach/memory.h In-Reply-To: <20110926131524.GJ22455@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110926131524.GJ22455@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 01:53:49PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > Re-ping. > > > > Please let me know if there is something wrong with this series as I > > would like to have sufficient time to fix it if needed. > > I think it's fairly obvious why I've not taken this (because of the > StrongARM changes which I've still not yet tested.) Once I've sorted > that out I can take it, but not before then. Especially so as my > firewall uses this CPU and I don't want it to break and force me > offline as a result. As I said in that same message: | I also merged the patch entitled "get rid of a few StrongARM | cache-related build time constants" as this is a prerequisite for the | removal of mach/memory.h in mach-ebsa110 and mach-shark (more if the | sparsemem stuff gets moved). If you don't feel comfortable having | this patch merged then I can remove it along with those commits that depend | on it. So let me remove that and ask you to pull again. Nicolas