From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 08:31:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Pull request: removal of most instances of mach/memory.h
In-Reply-To: <20110927072156.GQ22455@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1109260952490.2718@xanadu.home>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1109261023360.2718@xanadu.home>
	<20110926191055.GP22455@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1109261514330.2718@xanadu.home>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1109261606210.2718@xanadu.home>
	<20110926223839.GB23680@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1109261901550.2718@xanadu.home>
	<20110926232943.GD23680@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1109262028310.2718@xanadu.home>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1109262047290.2718@xanadu.home>
	<20110927072156.GQ22455@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1109270829360.2718@xanadu.home>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> The fact of the matter is that you should have said in the final pull
> request that you'd also sent one of the patches to the patch system
> _whether_ _or_ _not_ it was applied.  Whether it was applied or not
> is completely irrelevant - because either way it requires some action
> (either to remove it from my git tree if applied _OR_ discard it from
> the patch system if not.)
> 
> The fact you didn't mention it in the final pull request at all is the
> problem.

Yes, you'reright.


Nicolas