From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 00:47:22 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCH RFC] clk: add support for automatic parent handling
In-Reply-To: <20110429221921.GE14871@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20110421072259.GG31131@pengutronix.de>
	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1104211045220.3323@ionos>
	<20110429103723.GF5126@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1104291252080.3005@ionos>
	<20110429110610.GJ5126@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1104291344020.3005@ionos>
	<20110429132613.GL5126@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1104291620170.3005@ionos>
	<20110429220746.GB14871@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1104300009420.3005@ionos>
	<20110429221921.GE14871@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1104300041060.3005@ionos>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:16:52AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 05:31:44PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > }
> > > 
> > > I'm going to give up discussing this with you - you have no desire to
> > > even understand what I'm saying.  I don't see any point continuing this
> > > discussion any further.
> > 
> > Right, I have no interest in understanding what you want to do. 
> 
> And that's your basic problem.  You don't even want to try and understand
> these arguments.  So its pointless continuing the discussion.

I see. We are at the point where selective quoting is the solution to
the problem. And yes, it's my fault that I forgot to put the <SARCASM>
tags around that sentence.

> Thanks for confirming that I've been wasting my time over the last couple
> of days.

If you insist on moving a technical discussion to a personal
mudslinging level, then we really can stop right here.

Thanks,

	tglx