public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [patch 2/7] clocksource: Get rid of the hardcoded 5 seconds sleep time limit
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 10:43:24 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105191041030.3078@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305766655.2915.187.camel@work-vm>

On Wed, 18 May 2011, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 21:33 +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > -	 * Ideally we want to use  some of the limits used in
> > -	 * clocksource_max_deferment, to provide a more informed
> > -	 * MAX_UPDATE_LENGTH. But for now this just gets the
> > -	 * register interface working properly.
> > +	 * Calc the maximum number of seconds which we can run before
> > +	 * wrapping around. For clocksources which have a mask > 32bit
> > +	 * we need to limit the max sleep time to have a good
> > +	 * conversion precision. 10 minutes is still a reasonable
> > +	 * amount. That results in a shift value of 24 for a
> > +	 * clocksource with mask >= 40bit and f >= 4GHz. That maps to
> > +	 * ~ 0.06ppm granularity for NTP. We apply the same 12.5%
> > +	 * margin as we do in clocksource_max_deferment()
> >  	 */
> 
> So, its not clear to me that the 12.5% margin really needed, since we
> take it out when we calculate clocksource_max_deferment(). Although with
> or without the margin I get the same mult/shift/max_idle_ns values for
> the hardware I'm testing.
> 
> Another nice detail from the change: It doesn't affect clocksources that
> normally wrap quickly:
> 
> Without your patch:
> --------------
> JDB: hpet mult: 2684354560 shift: 26 max_idle: 83214991360
> JDB: acpi_pm mult: 2343484437 shift: 23 max_idle: 4540500826
> JDB: tsc mult: 1342183991 shift: 31 max_idle: 2600481483
> 
> With your patch:
> ---------------
> JDB: hpet mult: 2684354560 shift: 26 max_idle: 83214991360
> JDB: acpi_pm mult: 2343484437 shift: 23 max_idle: 4540500826
> JDB: tsc mult: 10485812 shift: 24 max_idle: 332861616128
> 
> Although interestingly 332 secs calculated for the max idle is more then
> 12% off of 600.

We probably need to look at the math of clocksource_max_deferment()
again.
 
> Overall it looks good. I'm doing some NTP testing with the TSC shift
> change to make sure we don't get any odd side effects. I'll let you know
> how those go.

Ok.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-19  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-18 21:33 [patch 0/7] clocksources/clockevents improvements Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-18 21:33 ` [patch 2/7] clocksource: Get rid of the hardcoded 5 seconds sleep time limit Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-19  0:57   ` John Stultz
2011-05-19  8:43     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-05-20  1:10     ` john stultz
2011-05-18 21:33 ` [patch 1/7] clocksource: Restructure clocksource struct members Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-18 21:33 ` [patch 3/7] clockevents: Restructure clock_event_device members Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-18 21:33 ` [patch 4/7] clockevents: Provide combined configure and register function Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-19  9:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-19 10:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-19 18:10       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 21:33 ` [patch 5/7] clockevents: Provide interface to reconfigure an active clock event device Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-19  7:26   ` Linus Walleij
2011-05-19  9:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-19  9:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-19  9:37       ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-18 21:33 ` [patch 6/7] x86: Convert PIT to clockevents_config_and_register() Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-18 21:33 ` [patch 7/7] x86: hpet: Cleanup the clockevents init and register code Thomas Gleixner
2011-05-19  9:33   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-19  9:34 ` [patch 0/7] clocksources/clockevents improvements Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1105191041030.3078@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox