From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:50:29 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: TI-Davinci 6446 oops on interrupts
In-Reply-To: <4DED124C.50205@selfish.org>
References: <4DECCADE.6080100@selfish.org>
	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1106061518480.13964@ionos>
	<20110606163210.GC7448@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
	<4DED124C.50205@selfish.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1106061948140.13964@ionos>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, Holger Freyther wrote:

> On 06/06/2011 06:32 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> thanks for your time and sorry for sending a truncated kernel oops. In the
> other part of the thread we found that the davinci GPIO code overrides the IRQ
> chip data.
> 
> 
> > Unless we have the Code: line we don't know what the code being executed
> > was.  It's important that folk always report the entire oops dump, not
> > extracts from it that they _think_ may be relevant.
> 
> is it still useful to send a complete oops, or do you think the issue is fully
> understood?

It is. Letting chip data point to something which is not expected by
the generic chip is definitly causing that issue.

Thanks,

	tglx