From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:39:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [GIT PULL] DEBUG_LL platform updates for 3.2 In-Reply-To: <20111013082836.GG21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110928103815.GA8344@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <2414781.rlNqTThJUN@wuerfel> <1837446.fiK2eIOO53@wuerfel> <20111013082836.GG21648@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 10:30:11AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 11 October 2011 20:03:38 Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > > I've stuck them into the arm-soc tree for now, so we get linux-next > > > > coverage, but I won't send them to Linus this way because then we > > > > would get the same commits twice in the history. > > > > > > Could you please do the same with the following: > > > > > > git://git.linaro.org/people/nico/linux.git mach_memory_h > > > > > > Russell pulled it at some point, and dropped it due to concerns about > > > repeated conflict resolutions (or so I presume). I just did a test > > > merge between your for-next branch and the above and that looked trivial > > > enough. > > > > Ok, done. > > Bypassing maintainers stinks - especially when there are unaddressed > comments outstanding. Nicolas has "simplified" my objections in this > request for you to pull - and has completely ignored the problem that > it breaks ZBOOT_ROM by deleting the zreladdr definitions on EP93xx > with no way for that to be provided. I also told you that EP93xx doesn't use ZBOOT_ROM anywhere, and that this was approved by the EP93xx maintainers. Furthermore I said that I intended to make ZBOOT_ROM dependent on CONFIG_PHYS_OFFSET, given that PHYS_OFFSEt and zreladdr are intimately related which I also explained previously. This doesn't have to go in right away though. But if this is one of your _requirements_, I'd have appreciated you made it clearer instead of letting me to dry without any feedback, especially when I re-re-re-pinged you last week and before. So much for having lectured me on proper communication. Nicolas