From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix unwinding for XIP kernels
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:28:14 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1111181321390.13989@xanadu.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111117141706.GI4748@arm.com>
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 01:40:00PM +0000, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > The linker places the unwind tables in readonly sections. So when using
> > an XIP kernel these are located in ROM and cannot be modified.
> >
> > For that reason don't convert the symbol addresses during boot (or
> > module loading) but only when interpreting them in search_index().
> > Moreover several consts are added to catch future writes and rename the
> > member "addr" of struct unwind_idx to "addr_offset" to better match the
> > new semantic.
> >
> > This fixes unwinding on XIP which compared prel31 offsets to absolute
> > addresses because the initial conversion from prel31 to absolute failed.
>
> My only worry - does this increase the index search by doing the prel31
> conversion every time? It could affect tools like lockdep that need to
> get the backtrace regularly at run-time.
We're talking about two constant shifts and an add. something that
myght take around 2 cycles on ARM. Hardly noticeable I would say,
especially given that lockdep is already quite costly and hardly
something you want to keep around in production anyway.
On the plus side, this fixes the XIP case, and allow for backtrace to be
usable pretty early without any explicit initialization.
As far as I'm concerned (which isn't much as this is not my code):
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-18 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-17 13:40 [PATCH] ARM: fix unwinding for XIP kernels Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-17 14:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-17 18:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-18 18:28 ` Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2011-11-18 21:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-20 11:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-20 22:52 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-20 23:12 ` [PATCH RFC] ARM: unwind: optimize to not convert each table value but the address Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-21 16:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-21 18:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-30 17:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-30 19:07 ` [PATCH] ARM: fix unwinding for XIP kernels Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-30 19:37 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-11-30 19:52 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-21 18:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-28 9:22 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-28 9:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-11-28 10:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-11-28 10:07 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1111181321390.13989@xanadu.home \
--to=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).