From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org (Nicolas Pitre)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:20:20 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [PATCH-WIP 01/13] xen/arm: use r12 to pass the hypercall number
 to the hypervisor
In-Reply-To: <CA+wbFdfF5c+Bw6RrxCm3YThqCRDuDYzanq+HV8a6LyXaBqWrQA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1202231714590.23091@kaball-desktop>
 <1330019314-20865-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
 <1330360043.8557.302.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
 <20120227180355.GB2023@linaro.org>
 <1330371219.10008.34.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk>
 <20120228102040.GB2063@linaro.org>
 <1330426133.31269.70.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.00.1202281149210.23091@kaball-desktop>
 <20120229093436.GA2077@linaro.org>
 <1330509362.4270.20.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
 <20120229125826.GC2077@linaro.org>
 <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203021528150.31242@xanadu.home> <4F5882BF.1030104@arm.com>
 <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203081041340.24151@xanadu.home> <4F58FEC0.8080706@arm.com>
 <CA+wbFdfF5c+Bw6RrxCm3YThqCRDuDYzanq+HV8a6LyXaBqWrQA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203091112050.24151@xanadu.home>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Dave Martin wrote:

> Register variables feel like a red herring though.  We're only using
> those because we can't do the needful thing and actually desscribe
> these constraints in the asm constraints (which would seem to be the
> right place).  We specifically don't care where those values are
> except at the boundaries of the asm block itself.

Absolutely.

> Is there a reason why ARM gcc doesn't provide the ability to specify
> such exact-register constraints, or is this more for historical
> reasons?  It is possible?

I don't know how much things have changed since I last looked at the gcc 
code, but implementing this seemed to be pretty trivial at the time.  
The problem would be to determine a good letter scheme to map to actual 
registers.


Nicolas