From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 11:24:36 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [PATCH v3 1/5] ARM: protect usage of cr_alignment by #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15 In-Reply-To: <1331720483-10075-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> References: <20120314101928.GA29474@pengutronix.de> <1331720483-10075-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig I think you could reduce the amount of #ifdef's significantly here. While the cr_alignment variable and its sister are of no use in a no-CP15 system, you could still leave them there initialized to zero and only conditionally compile out the CP15 modifyers with a dummy version. This is only 2 words wasted in your kernel image to keep the code cleaner. More comments below. > index 854bd22..efeb2d0 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S > @@ -98,8 +98,10 @@ __mmap_switched: > str r9, [r4] @ Save processor ID > str r1, [r5] @ Save machine type > str r2, [r6] @ Save atags pointer > - bic r4, r0, #CR_A @ Clear 'A' bit > - stmia r7, {r0, r4} @ Save control register values > + cmp r7, #0 > + itt ne > + bicne r4, r0, #CR_A @ Clear 'A' bit > + stmneia r7, {r0, r4} @ Save control register values The kernel is compiled with -mimplicit-it so you do not need to specify any it here. > index a255c39..50d3df8 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c > @@ -472,9 +472,13 @@ static void __init setup_processor(void) > cpu_cache = *list->cache; > #endif > > - printk("CPU: %s [%08x] revision %d (ARMv%s), cr=%08lx\n", > + printk("CPU: %s [%08x] revision %d (ARMv%s)", > cpu_name, read_cpuid_id(), read_cpuid_id() & 15, > - proc_arch[cpu_architecture()], cr_alignment); > + proc_arch[cpu_architecture()]); > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15 > + printk(KERN_CONT ", cr=%08lx\n", cr_alignment); > +#endif > Again, you could just leave the original display, with cr=00000000 which is a fairly good representation of reality. > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c > index caf14dc..119d178 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c > @@ -89,7 +89,11 @@ core_param(alignment, ai_usermode, int, 0600); > /* Return true if and only if the ARMv6 unaligned access model is in use. */ > static bool cpu_is_v6_unaligned(void) > { > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15 > return cpu_architecture() >= CPU_ARCH_ARMv6 && (cr_alignment & CR_U); > +#else > + return 0; > +#endif > } Same here. With cr_alignment set to zero, you don't need the above #ifdef. > static int safe_usermode(int new_usermode, bool warn) > @@ -961,12 +965,14 @@ static int __init alignment_init(void) > return -ENOMEM; > #endif > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15 > if (cpu_is_v6_unaligned()) { > cr_alignment &= ~CR_A; > cr_no_alignment &= ~CR_A; > set_cr(cr_alignment); > ai_usermode = safe_usermode(ai_usermode, false); > } > +#endif Here the #ifdef is probably legitimate. > hook_fault_code(FAULT_CODE_ALIGNMENT, do_alignment, SIGBUS, BUS_ADRALN, > "alignment exception"); > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > index 94c5a0c..f6dbe1a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c > @@ -109,8 +109,10 @@ static int __init early_cachepolicy(char *p) > > if (memcmp(p, cache_policies[i].policy, len) == 0) { > cachepolicy = i; > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15 > cr_alignment &= ~cache_policies[i].cr_mask; > cr_no_alignment &= ~cache_policies[i].cr_mask; > +#endif Probably here as well. > break; > } > } > @@ -128,7 +130,9 @@ static int __init early_cachepolicy(char *p) > cachepolicy = CPOLICY_WRITEBACK; > } > flush_cache_all(); > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15 > set_cr(cr_alignment); > +#endif However it might be best to provide a dummy set_cr() instead of #ifdef'ing it out everywhere. Nicolas