From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: irq_set_chained_handler() called too early for hwirq to be initialized
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:34:50 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1210281810390.2756@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508D55C9.3030702@antcom.de>
On Sun, 28 Oct 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
>
> consider arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/irq.c: irq_set_chained_handler() is
> called at a point where it accesses
> irq_to_desc(IRQ_LPC32XX_SUB2IRQ)->irq_data.hwirq but which is not yet
> initialized.
None of the functions which are called inside of
irq_set_chained_handler() touches desc->irq_data.hwirq.
So what are you talking about?
I just had a look into that lpc32xx irq code. At the end of
lpc32xx_init_irq():
irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, NR_IRQS, 0);
if (irq_base < 0) {
pr_warn("Cannot allocate irq_descs, assuming pre-allocated\n");
irq_base = 0;
}
That's just hilarious.
Of course are the interrupts preallocated, simply because
machine_desc->nr_irqs is 0 and therefor the ARM core code allocates
NR_IRQS irq descriptors in the early setup way before
lpc32xx_init_irq() is called.
If those interrupts would not be preallocated, then the code would
fail to initialize any interrupt at all. And of course nothing would
notice as all function calls to set_irq_* do not check the return
value.
That brilliant thing came in via commit f5c42271 (ARM: LPC32xx: Device
tree support). I have no idea from where you copied that and why you
thought putting it at the end of the init function would be a good
idea.
Though, that has nothing todo with your problem description above.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-28 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-28 15:56 irq_set_chained_handler() called too early for hwirq to be initialized Roland Stigge
2012-10-28 17:34 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2012-10-28 18:36 ` Roland Stigge
2012-10-28 18:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1210281810390.2756@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox