From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.pitre@linaro.org (Nicolas Pitre) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:22:10 -0500 (EST) Subject: [PATCH 13/16] drivers: misc: add ARM CCI support In-Reply-To: <50F057D7.1010808@ti.com> References: <1357777251-13541-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <1357777251-13541-14-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> <50F057D7.1010808@ti.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 11 Jan 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > On Thursday 10 January 2013 05:50 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi > > > > On ARM multi-cluster systems coherency between cores running on > > different clusters is managed by the cache-coherent interconnect (CCI). > > It allows broadcasting of TLB invalidates and memory barriers and it > > guarantees cache coherency at system level. > > > > This patch enables the basic infrastructure required in Linux to > > handle and programme the CCI component. The first implementation is > > based on a platform device, its relative DT compatible property and > > a simple programming interface. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre > > --- > > drivers/misc/Kconfig | 3 ++ > > drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/misc/arm-cci.c | 107 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/arm-cci.h | 30 ++++++++++++++ > How about 'drivers/bus/' considering CCI is an interconnect bus (though > for coherency) Yes, I like that better. > > 4 files changed, 141 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 drivers/misc/arm-cci.c > > create mode 100644 include/linux/arm-cci.h > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig > > index b151b7c1bd..30d5be1ad2 100644 > > --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig > > @@ -499,6 +499,9 @@ config USB_SWITCH_FSA9480 > > stereo and mono audio, video, microphone and UART data to use > > a common connector port. > > > > +config ARM_CCI > You might want add depends on ARM big.LITTTLE otherwise it will > break build for other arch's with random configurations. As far as this patch goes, this is buildable on other architectures too. The next patch changes that though. > [..] > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/arm-cci.c b/drivers/misc/arm-cci.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000000..f329c43099 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/misc/arm-cci.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,107 @@ > > +/* > > + * CCI support > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd. > > + * Author: Lorenzo Pieralisi > > + * > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > > + * > > + * This program is distributed "as is" WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY of any > > + * kind, whether express or implied; without even the implied warranty > > + * of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > > + * GNU General Public License for more details. > > + */ > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +#define CCI400_EAG_OFFSET 0x4000 > > +#define CCI400_KF_OFFSET 0x5000 > > + > > +#define DRIVER_NAME "CCI" > > +struct cci_drvdata { > > + void __iomem *baseaddr; > > + spinlock_t lock; > > +}; > > + > > +static struct cci_drvdata *info; > > + > > +void disable_cci(int cluster) > > +{ > > + u32 cci_reg = cluster ? CCI400_KF_OFFSET : CCI400_EAG_OFFSET; > > + writel_relaxed(0x0, info->baseaddr + cci_reg); > > + > > + while (readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + 0xc) & 0x1) > > + ; > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_cci); > > + > Is more functionality going to be added for CCI driver. Having this > much of driver code for just a disable_cci() functions seems like > overkill. Yes. More code will appear here to provide pmu functionalities, etc. Nicolas