From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: allow an alternative setup for the mask cache
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:55:56 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1303152046180.22263@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51434BC2.70105@keymile.com>
On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Gerlando Falauto wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 03/14/2013 06:45 PM, Simon Guinot wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:10:30PM +0100, Holger Brunck wrote:
> > > @@ -243,9 +243,12 @@ void irq_setup_generic_chip(struct irq_chip_generic
> > > *gc, u32 msk,
> > > list_add_tail(&gc->list, &gc_list);
> > > raw_spin_unlock(&gc_lock);
> > >
> > > + /* Setup pointer to mask_cache */
> > > + gc->pmask_cache = &gc->mask_cache;
> >
> > You need a flag here to choose between gc->mask_cache and
> > ct->mask_cache.
>
> I'm sorry, I don't understand...
> Shouldn't pmask_cache be a pointer within ct, so that the pointers for all
> instances could either be the same (in case of a single register) or all
> different (in case of multiple registers)?
You are right. gc->pmask_cache wont solve the issue.
We need a ct->pmask_cache, so the various instances of gc->ct[] can
have their own selector, which default to gc-mask_cache if not
requested to be separate by a flag. In that case we need to initialize
the ct->mask_cache at setup time for each ct. No modifications to
setup_alt_chip() required then.
> I already have a patch which seems to work, but I'm afraid I've come to YAM
> (Yet Another Misunderstanding (R) ) in regards to Thomas' suggestion.
No, that was my brain going backwards :)
Care to send your patch ?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-15 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 16:10 [PATCH] genirq: allow an alternative setup for the mask cache Holger Brunck
2013-03-14 17:45 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-15 10:43 ` Holger Brunck
2013-03-15 11:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-15 16:26 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:55 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-03-14 19:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 19:42 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-18 11:05 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] refactoring for mask_cache Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] genirq: cosmetic: remove cur_regs Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] genirq: move mask_cache into struct irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 20:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-18 7:59 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 8:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-15 21:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] refactoring for mask_cache Andrew Lunn
2013-03-15 23:34 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] genirq: cosmetic: remove cur_regs Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] genirq: add mask_cache and pmask_cache into struct irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] gpio: mvebu: convert to usage of *pmask_cache within irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] MIPS: JZ4740: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] ARM: SAMSUNG: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] genirq: rename mask_cache to shared_mask_cache Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] genirq: handle separate mask registers Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] orion-gpio: enable IRQ_GC_SEPARATE_MASK_REGISTERS Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] gpio: mvebu: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] refactoring for mask_cache Simon Guinot
2013-03-18 14:39 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-19 10:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-19 10:09 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-19 11:06 ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-19 11:10 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:44 ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-19 11:56 ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-20 17:40 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-20 21:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-21 10:37 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-21 10:59 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-19 11:19 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-21 10:51 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-21 11:24 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-04-04 9:31 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1303152046180.22263@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).