linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: allow an alternative setup for the mask cache
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:55:56 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1303152046180.22263@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51434BC2.70105@keymile.com>

On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Gerlando Falauto wrote:

> Hi Simon,
> 
> On 03/14/2013 06:45 PM, Simon Guinot wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 05:10:30PM +0100, Holger Brunck wrote:
> > > @@ -243,9 +243,12 @@ void irq_setup_generic_chip(struct irq_chip_generic
> > > *gc, u32 msk,
> > >   	list_add_tail(&gc->list, &gc_list);
> > >   	raw_spin_unlock(&gc_lock);
> > > 
> > > +	/* Setup pointer to mask_cache */
> > > +	gc->pmask_cache = &gc->mask_cache;
> > 
> > You need a flag here to choose between gc->mask_cache and
> > ct->mask_cache.
> 
> I'm sorry, I don't understand...
> Shouldn't pmask_cache be a pointer within ct, so that the pointers for all
> instances could either be the same (in case of a single register) or all
> different (in case of multiple registers)?

You are right. gc->pmask_cache wont solve the issue.

We need a ct->pmask_cache, so the various instances of gc->ct[] can
have their own selector, which default to gc-mask_cache if not
requested to be separate by a flag. In that case we need to initialize
the ct->mask_cache at setup time for each ct. No modifications to
setup_alt_chip() required then.

> I already have a patch which seems to work, but I'm afraid I've come to YAM
> (Yet Another Misunderstanding (R) ) in regards to Thomas' suggestion.

No, that was my brain going backwards :)

Care to send your patch ?

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-15 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-14 16:10 [PATCH] genirq: allow an alternative setup for the mask cache Holger Brunck
2013-03-14 17:45 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-15 10:43   ` Holger Brunck
2013-03-15 11:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-15 16:26   ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:55     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-03-14 19:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 19:42 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-18 11:05   ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] refactoring for mask_cache Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36   ` [PATCH 1/2] genirq: cosmetic: remove cur_regs Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36   ` [PATCH 2/2] genirq: move mask_cache into struct irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 20:47     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-18  7:59       ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18  8:56         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-15 21:25   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] refactoring for mask_cache Andrew Lunn
2013-03-15 23:34     ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 1/9] genirq: cosmetic: remove cur_regs Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 2/9] genirq: add mask_cache and pmask_cache into struct irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:32     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 3/9] gpio: mvebu: convert to usage of *pmask_cache within irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 4/9] MIPS: JZ4740: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 5/9] ARM: SAMSUNG: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 6/9] genirq: rename mask_cache to shared_mask_cache Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 7/9] genirq: handle separate mask registers Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 8/9] orion-gpio: enable IRQ_GC_SEPARATE_MASK_REGISTERS Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 9/9] gpio: mvebu: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:28   ` [PATCH v3 0/9] refactoring for mask_cache Simon Guinot
2013-03-18 14:39     ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-19 10:03   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-19 10:09     ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:25       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-19 11:06     ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-19 11:10       ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:44         ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-19 11:56           ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-20 17:40             ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-20 21:42               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-21 10:37                 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-21 10:59               ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-19 11:19       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-21 10:51   ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-21 11:24     ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-04-04  9:31   ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1303152046180.22263@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).