linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] genirq: move mask_cache into struct irq_chip_type
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:47:23 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1303152101080.22263@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363376175-22312-3-git-send-email-gerlando.falauto@keymile.com>

Gerlando,

On Fri, 15 Mar 2013, Gerlando Falauto wrote:

> This fixes a regression introduced by e59347a
> "arm: orion: Use generic irq chip".
> 
> The same interrupt mask cache (stored within struct irq_chip_generic)
> is shared between all the irq_chip_type instances. As each irq_chip_type
> can use a distinct mask register, sharing a single mask cache may not be
> correct. For instance in the case of Orion SoCs, which have separate
> mask registers for edge and level interrupts.
> 
> This patch moves mask_cache from struct irq_chip_generic into struct
> irq_chip_type. Note that the interrupt support for Samsung SoCs is also
> slightly affected.

The patch is correct, but we want a more incremental approach.

Step 1: 
     Add the pointer and the mask_cache to ct
     init all ct->pointers in the setup code to gc->mask_cache
     switch core code over to use the ct->pointer

     Functional equivilent!

Step 2:
     Convert each user out of core to the ct->pointer (separate patches)

     Functional equivilent!

Step 3:
     Rename gc->mask_cache to gc->shared_mask_cache

     And we keep that instead of using ct[0].mask_cache simply because
     it makes the code simpler to understand.

Step 4:
     Add the extra flag and the initializer for the separate mask_caches

Step5:
     Convert the affected SOCs (separate patches)

Otherwise I only have a coding style related request:

> @@ -246,9 +246,21 @@ void irq_setup_generic_chip(struct irq_chip_generic *gc, u32 msk,
>  	list_add_tail(&gc->list, &gc_list);
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&gc_lock);
>  
> -	/* Init mask cache ? */
> -	if (flags & IRQ_GC_INIT_MASK_CACHE)
> -		gc->mask_cache = irq_reg_readl(gc->reg_base + ct->regs.mask);
> +	for (i = 0; i < gc->num_ct; i++) {
> +		if (flags & IRQ_GC_SEPARATE_MASK_REGISTERS)
> +			/* Define mask cache pointer */
> +			ct[i].pmask_cache = &ct[i].mask_cache;
> +		else
> +			/* They all point to the same mask cache */
> +			ct[i].pmask_cache = &ct[0].mask_cache;
> +
> +		/* Init mask cache ? */
> +		if ((flags & IRQ_GC_INIT_MASK_CACHE)
> +		 && ((flags & IRQ_GC_SEPARATE_MASK_REGISTER)
> +		  || (i == 0)))
> +			*ct[i].pmask_cache =
> +				irq_reg_readl(gc->reg_base + ct[i].regs.mask);
> +	}

My eyes are burning, my head is spinning and I have a hard time not to
use swearwords.

	bool mskperct = flags & IRQ_GC_SEPARATE_MASK_REGISTERS;
	bool mskinit = flags & IRQ_GC_INIT_MASK_CACHE;
	u32 *shmsk = &gc->shared_mask_cache;

	if (!mskperct && mskinit)
	     	*shmsk = irq_reg_readl(gc->reg_base + ct->regs.mask);

	for (i = 0; i < gc->num_ct: i++, ct++) {
	       ct->pmask_cache = mskperct ? &ct->mask_cache : shmsk;
	       
	       if (mskperct && mskinit)
	       	  	ct->mask_cache = irq_reg_readl(gc->reg_base +
				       	 	       ct->regs.mask);
	}

Or something like that, perhaps ?

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-15 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-14 16:10 [PATCH] genirq: allow an alternative setup for the mask cache Holger Brunck
2013-03-14 17:45 ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-15 10:43   ` Holger Brunck
2013-03-15 11:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-15 16:26   ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 19:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-14 19:42 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-18 11:05   ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] refactoring for mask_cache Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36   ` [PATCH 1/2] genirq: cosmetic: remove cur_regs Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 19:36   ` [PATCH 2/2] genirq: move mask_cache into struct irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-15 20:47     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-03-18  7:59       ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18  8:56         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-15 21:25   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] refactoring for mask_cache Andrew Lunn
2013-03-15 23:34     ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-18 14:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 1/9] genirq: cosmetic: remove cur_regs Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 2/9] genirq: add mask_cache and pmask_cache into struct irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:32     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 3/9] gpio: mvebu: convert to usage of *pmask_cache within irq_chip_type Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 4/9] MIPS: JZ4740: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 5/9] ARM: SAMSUNG: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 6/9] genirq: rename mask_cache to shared_mask_cache Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 7/9] genirq: handle separate mask registers Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 8/9] orion-gpio: enable IRQ_GC_SEPARATE_MASK_REGISTERS Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:00   ` [PATCH v3 9/9] gpio: mvebu: " Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-18 14:28   ` [PATCH v3 0/9] refactoring for mask_cache Simon Guinot
2013-03-18 14:39     ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-19 10:03   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-19 10:09     ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:25       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-19 11:06     ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-19 11:10       ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-19 11:44         ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-19 11:56           ` Jason Cooper
2013-03-20 17:40             ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-20 21:42               ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-21 10:37                 ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-03-21 10:59               ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-19 11:19       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-03-21 10:51   ` Simon Guinot
2013-03-21 11:24     ` Gerlando Falauto
2013-04-04  9:31   ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1303152101080.22263@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).