From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner) Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 22:42:39 +0100 (CET) Subject: [PATCH v3 0/9] refactoring for mask_cache In-Reply-To: <5149F48D.3030706@keymile.com> References: <1363277430-21325-1-git-send-email-holger.brunck@keymile.com><1363615255-18200-1-git-send-email-gerlando.falauto@keymile.com><20130319100352.GB2419@localhost><20130319110620.GO13280@titan.lakedaemon.net><51484793.5020102@keymile.com><20130319114430.GP13280@titan.lakedaemon.net> <20130319115615.GR13280@titan.lakedaemon.net> <5149F48D.3030706@keymile.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Gerlando Falauto wrote: > On 03/19/2013 12:56 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 07:44:31AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > > > Those commit IDs are going to change once LinusW (I presume) applies > > > them to his tree, so he'll have to edit each commit message to point the > > > the correct commit. > > > > > > LinusW, do you want me to handle this? > > > > Never mind, coffee underflow to /dev/brain. One drawback to mutt, can't > > view thread while typing messages... > > 1) I had no idea who LinusW is, I assume Linus Walleij who should be the > maintainer of linux-gpio. And linux-gpio should have nothing to do with this > discussion... so I should assume you never mentioned him, right? Jason had a brain hickup as he told. So please ignore that part :) > 2) About the SOB part... most of this is inspired by Simon's original (single) > patch and Holger's reworking. Should they be given credit or not? If yes, how? > If I don't get an answer I would just assume no and I'll take all the blame > and credit all by myself. :-) Yes, you can give them credit. There are only a few official "....-by:" tags, but you can chose from the inofficial ones: Suggested-by: Originally-by: Original-patch-by: Requested-by: Original-idea-by: Based-on-patch-by: That's an incomplete list of already in-use tags, but one of those is probably sufficient. > 3) Jason, did you mean you would pull it to > http://git.infradead.org/users/jcooper/linux.git? Shall I change the SOB lines > and resubmit? Or should I submit it somewhere else instead? That needs to go through my tree, really. And please just post it to LKML with the relevant people CC'ed. > 4) About submitting to -stable, I guess it wouldn't make any sense until it > gets included upstream Right. Though I'm a bit concerned about the amount of change involved. So it's simpler to do: Cc: # simple resolution will be sent in reply Then let the people who have this problem reply on that patch series with a simple revert of that generic_chip() conversion commit concering their particular subarchitecture instead of forcing a nightmare of complex (and maybe untested) changes onto stable. Thanks, tglx