linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tglx@linutronix.de (Thomas Gleixner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:12:22 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1303271811020.22263@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130327150634.4014.64797@quantum>

On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2013-03-27 02:08:15)
> > I wonder if it would make sense to abstract these operations in a generic 
> > recursive mutex. Given that it would delay this patch past v3.10 I won't push 
> > for that.
> > 
> 
> Having a nice implementation of recursive mutexes would have saved me
> some time.

If you encapsulate stuff nicely like I suggested, then switching to a
generic version later on is a nobrainer.
 
Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-27 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-27  7:09 [PATCH v4] clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework Mike Turquette
2013-03-27  9:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-27 15:06   ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-27 17:12     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-03-27  9:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27  9:55   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-27 10:03     ` Ulf Hansson
2013-03-27 11:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 14:25         ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-27  9:59   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-27 11:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 16:47   ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-27 17:09     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-27 22:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-28  3:00   ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  4:45 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] reentrancy in the common " Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  4:45   ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: abstract locking out into helper functions Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  9:31     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-28  4:45   ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework Mike Turquette
2013-03-28  9:33     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-03-28 15:23       ` Mike Turquette
2013-03-28 10:44   ` [PATCH v5 0/2] reentrancy in the common " Laurent Pinchart
2013-03-28 20:59   ` [PATCH v6 " Mike Turquette
2013-03-28 20:59     ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: abstract locking out into helper functions Mike Turquette
2013-04-02  9:23       ` Ulf Hansson
2013-03-28 20:59     ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: allow reentrant calls into the clk framework Mike Turquette
2013-04-02  9:35       ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1303271811020.22263@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).