From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: nico@fluxnic.net (Nicolas Pitre)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 17:29:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Removal of NWFPE in its entirety, and VFP emulation code
In-Reply-To: <yw1x1uai84p9.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
References: <20130410104002.GF14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <yw1xmwt68whw.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
 <20130410114229.GH14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <yw1xip3u8uni.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
 <20130410185421.GI14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <yw1xehei8a19.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
 <20130410200344.GO14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <yw1x61zu866d.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
 <20130410210431.GQ14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <yw1x1uai84p9.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1304101725280.17375@syhkavp.arg>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:

> Yet the A9 clearly does trap, just like the TRM says it should.  So
> which is more likely, that the TRM and silicon are both wrong, or that
> you are wrong?  Perhaps we should put it to a vote.

Instead of encouraging the pissing contest, could you please provide 
compilable example code that would trap so that anyone can test and 
report results back?


Nicolas