From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 675D0C4451C for ; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:50:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=XnxogIQS7eoD999V7HLL1Y7l5CDp4hmKICTpMm/zYng=; b=hUG8cymiuVGU+t6U4eYpPFugZ3 p6KDxnzt8kRtc7oE1pL0gwYePAtiUWcn/Palv81UWxMFqa/yoYJqDbFmDnDJNwWxMXRXluMRo4kyv ca9LZ3xU4c04avUsUn/7I2sF8A/ZTr8bGKOsw91ygWK21QSAVF9hfj9qDxLzGrF1ssw9dm74C6I1w ziofsM58n485geF0fR98kyiYu++t1888BVg8fieLnURTEQZMKmol8EMKWzTlsxOSGeL8J14kpjPF7 koKe9pVwnQmaOy6XnqSfsfEvFQXXKkwzFjVAbo+nlaGaMDM4TxAECKveNXsMZ6obI3XjltqYByEj3 z0SYoHhg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wmQmk-0000000B087-2dBz; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:50:30 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wmQmi-0000000B07c-12rE; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:50:29 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEF760A6E; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:50:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A69921F00A3F; Wed, 22 Jul 2026 06:50:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784703026; bh=XnxogIQS7eoD999V7HLL1Y7l5CDp4hmKICTpMm/zYng=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=U6R84Ps3/o94s4otuUkA+xNRsB5SBqBibOFkn3ZUnHYqT68BNhN4Q6nc4CuniP19I zYEnJ1fmed/32oOwBB71rH0FjI5bExSFo+zlkkxYGw3sCWwij82ZJ8uclZpZQlVyo8 ebrxOKEISusfcf7TJmWKFvFZOfZqSmurjyLJks8m+sX/YHFgL7k4zBlJwb1k5wn24E 1fk9q3Vcd4xS/QdQVthkdevDIv5Suvv0pRY9ose9471KFU3cykS+x/qOOCj5ZB0GIO /+an0VbZVI55lPLsc1ki6evJDFzMwpChtRqQkvtAM7j5el32I4dCakfifpWOZP5Wpi LVRtdVoJ6XJEA== Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 09:50:09 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Albert Ou , Andrew Morton , Andy Lutomirski , Brendan Jackman , Catalin Marinas , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , Huacai Chen , Ingo Molnar , Ingo Molnar , Kevin Brodsky , "Liam R. Howlett" , Lorenzo Stoakes , Michal Hocko , Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Peter Zijlstra , "H. Peter Anvin" , Suren Baghdasaryan , Thomas Gleixner , Vlastimil Babka , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/18] arch, mm: create a generic set_memory/change_page_attr core Message-ID: References: <20260721-generic-set-memory-v0-1-v1-0-2c1fc62306b3@kernel.org> <20260721171943.GEal-qLx4p5YbocQNV@fat_crate.local> <20260721195446.GHal_OhkuBCWQjmLQW@fat_crate.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260721195446.GHal_OhkuBCWQjmLQW@fat_crate.local> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 12:54:46PM -0700, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 09:28:56PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > I'll take it via the memblock tree? ;-) > > Definitely not. > > Unless you folks want to carve out the bits of set_memory.c which interact > with core mm and mark it as maintained by someone else. I personally don't > mind too much. Well, in essence that's what this set is doing: arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c | 611 ++++---------------------------- {arch/x86/mm/pat => mm}/cpa-test.c | 66 ++-- mm/set_memory.c | 396 +++++++++++++++++++++ I just decided to postpone MAINTAINERS update that would add mm/set_memory.c mm/cpa-test.c to MM CORE section until non-rfc version. > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette -- Sincerely yours, Mike.