From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: stmmac: improve TSO/GSO queue selection
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 22:36:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <an4qzUrK62-rN7Q6@lore-qca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812161038.5602eac9@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1448 bytes --]
On Aug 12, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:11:31 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > please drop this version, I will post v3 to fix some pending issues.
>
> FTR Russell was trying to fix TSO in this driver too, before giving up
> (on us?). The direction he was following of clearing the TSO caps in
> ndo_features_check and letting the stack GSO instead of all the weird
> hacks this driver has seemed much more sane. But maybe I'm missing
> something TBS specific here
Hi Jakub,
thx for the pointers. I reviewed Russell's commits and I guess we have two
options here:
- manages all the TSO/GSO checks in ndo_features_check() (stmmac_features_check())
and disable TSO/GSO if the selected queue does not support checksum offload
or it has TBS enabled. In this case I guess we can drop ndo_select_queue()
callback completely (it does not make sense to me to always use queue 0 for
TSO/GSO packets, e.g. it does not allow proper mqprio offload).
Please note this approach would introduce some performance regressions with
respect of the previous implementation.
- implements TSO/GSO checks in ndo_select_queue() callback
(stmmac_select_queue()) in order to keep TSO/GSO enabled if the selected
queue supports it and at the same time do not always use queue 0 for TSO/GSO
packets (proper qdisc offload). Please note this is patch I am proposing.
What do you think?
Regards,
Lorenzo
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 17:22 [PATCH net-next v2] net: stmmac: improve TSO/GSO queue selection Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-08-12 16:11 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-08-12 23:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-13 20:36 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2026-08-14 0:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=an4qzUrK62-rN7Q6@lore-qca \
--to=lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox