From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05A19C55174 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 09:52:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Um0FVaYNGuVA/zd9PefOAnqCJkiA3pKRm10xwwEqyB0=; b=2RTohQDenock3sER27KP94H8cS bkWtixmPgpgcqHOU+7rTWIgsTwH1EW2TrXFAITOMBaWwTvTsIVP7aR0JhPcOT5ffkRdiBst6HiNZj 0qA2gY0caQsF7aQBvBElGlAIaesVNmp0+wyb/306hqDRTHohlA/HMkRKSvhTH6kTUt7RScqOZhiED Xl6nnsRAzvmlp9wgwEiR4b6yGpdIhcCZIsq5vE66MzfRr8uc93whHAg3afOa1MbhN2GpJv/WWc6rp sCmv2d2XM9c3WlZv0uHo/GvpkhRNI8gVwRVhjAs+Cz4Ukfnbt2ZS2244uViEthuBMC2+SjpP73K4m hKAt3Z4Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wrYIA-00000003fPq-1SQk; Wed, 05 Aug 2026 09:52:06 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wrYI7-00000003fO4-09iL for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2026 09:52:05 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC50E153B; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 02:51:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E59393F66F; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 02:51:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1785923521; bh=FppMoqQb3BS4Kf1KNqMwfV4k8nOttVFmvr6G6hrRElA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kYbB2UOAtU/w+8T0WUapazRtMn6GjaxxiWPzKTHqDxwl79u9u7ObSXVPAad5G2uSJ todOdUjAG4zwFnnP0uj/RyEzw63v0bh1H5qXpNsDPIx+FpKzHavx6yjnKGQ7ggACrM r7WF6wYRUTfUutcGeOh2p8HMq1pySbmJTWswVlwA= Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 10:51:47 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , Jeremy Linton , Jonathan Cameron , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Steven Price , Suzuki K Poulose , Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus Message-ID: References: <20260805063255.1638614-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260805063255.1638614-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260805_025203_132244_62D28582 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.25 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 12:02:48PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote: > Changes from v8: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260707081351.1680209-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org > * Rebase onto the arm64 for-next/core branch. Was there a dependency on anything in for-next/core? We normally apply series on their own branch on top of the vanilla kernel (e.g. 7.2-rc3) and merge everything together in for-next/core. We (and many other maintainers) strongly prefer series posted on top of an -rc kernel (typically -rc1 to -rc3) unless there's a dependency on a different branch. Never based on -next or -next like branches (which is what for-next/core is, as the name implies). > * Move the RSI code from arch/arm64 to drivers/firmware/arm_rmm in patch 3. Thanks for this. -- Catalin