From: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
grayhat@foxmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 23:39:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anOok9XvLMNX_Aqu@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86ecgdaupe.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 08:32:29AM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> I'd rather keep it on the VM creation path. This is VM-wide data, by
> definition, and given that its size doesn't depend on the number of
> vcpus anymore (we allocate the maximum once and for all), it is right
> where it belongs. See the untested hack below for the freeing on error.
I'll send a v2 with this soon.
>
> > There's another issue in the current code: the ptdump debugfs file
> > keeps the raw mmu pointer as its private data. I would add that to the
> > commit message.
>
> Why is that a problem? With this approach, the mmu pointers are always
> expected to be valid, irrespective of the allocation pattern, and we
> only publish pointers to the dumper when the S2_mmu is actively being
> used.
>
Sorry I was talking about the old implementation. Array reallocation
leaves ptdump i_private pointers dangling.
I'm dropping the selftest for v2. It was a useful KASAN trigger, but is
not a good fit for the current suite.
Thanks,
Karl
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-05 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 22:44 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-03 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add a nested S2 MMU realloc test Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-04 14:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-04 14:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 14:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 21:54 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-05 7:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-05 21:39 ` Karl Mehltretter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anOok9XvLMNX_Aqu@gmail.com \
--to=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=grayhat@foxmail.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox