Re: (subset) [PATCH v9 00/13] fix several inconsistencies with sysfs configuration in etmX

[Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>]

On Thu, Aug 06, 2026 at 02:29:31PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2026 12:36:32 +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> > The current ETMx configuration via sysfs can lead to the following
> > inconsistencies:
> > 
> >   - If a configuration is modified via sysfs while a perf session is
> >     active, the running configuration may differ between before
> >     a sched-out and after a subsequent sched-in.
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Hi Levi,
> 
> I have applied the fixes from this series to coresight/next. I won't be able to
> pick up the rest without the Acks from Mike/Leo and it is too late for this
> pull request. So, will pick the rest in the next cycle. Apologies.
> 
> thanks!
> 
> [01/13] coresight: etm4x: fix wrong check of etm4x_sspcicrn_present()
>         https://git.kernel.org/coresight/c/be090fdfd4a6
> [02/13] coresight: etm4x: fix underflow for usage of (nrseqstate - 1)
>         https://git.kernel.org/coresight/c/bfe75e265efe
> [03/13] coresight: etm4x: fix leaked trace id
>         https://git.kernel.org/coresight/c/177a963da47e
> [05/13] coresight: etm4x: missing cscfg_csdev_disable_active_config() in perf enable
>         https://git.kernel.org/coresight/c/a1b49a640b19
> [12/13] coresight: etm4x: remove redundant fields in etmv4_save_state
>         https://git.kernel.org/coresight/c/b335d4ae1c73
> 
> Best regards,

Thanks Suzuki!

@Leo and @Mike, Could you ack for the others please?

-- 
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun