From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32F52C5AC82 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:25:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=QO2Ev8YLzg13BRqdk5yRT8KPxiqC1zHZFeTk1LNCdF4=; b=XE1kv5aJL4FRlOI0PdFAUWPdCi /5yJxMXc09H+GG9oBDa60817Jp8iQWl+7QF3azgTCQpARrg9XAZ4+PBPJL9en/D/KOv3iRHO3z1Nv O7ktkySniine21C1PBxwOkUmxBska9OdEH9YlDOPdNl5zW9XW/74gJioAGkRklRe+4/79NosoEQbM HnIadC882ssr+wPedL2mIE+t1eX2v6pkJ9VQqezvDlDt8dnCnCZ/q6+QsiGm4+h9u3TJ4CwkVm1ZF Ya3eT5hN/t4DvUNeaHHlZqcVzY25k1ZvaFvKdECnMMPZLfb7s/Re/5cG2zxvURNC+srOqxplUZn+f AZkbisFw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wtNBc-0000000BV4h-1rI4; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:24:52 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1wtNBY-0000000BV2y-0H4c for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:24:48 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF91542456; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EE3F1F00A3A; Mon, 10 Aug 2026 10:24:44 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786357487; bh=QO2Ev8YLzg13BRqdk5yRT8KPxiqC1zHZFeTk1LNCdF4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=PLtTk0Cfh6D8YQALwyYjF/H80rQE8ujJkzfn5lrQUhlV95MEwjd+K7Gxb1k2/SgjG 9npDiu8Na/le4Hclc0lJ3jVSa0pTYi9WCKVtSVDKdgxTdrIH5pr3gxeJvsPnU2A7sl ns8wRevt4hq0OPAFdmSgNtkyk09L//YG/XM9VqjugsqEI+Kd3HeHwmad8SihPZh9Bq PItIDsM48bf5cyqxeBL3FRBf6WxSHrgV/sURQIXj9X86d2h8HnsWx0HInO0jerOyPI LnUK9dQa4cNAbzHuh3G7p51y2JJcjsO4r7WMxTKYxlA9FpZ84uEcmEQlIpKHdByU5b BUISB4Ix0Dbgw== Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 11:24:42 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Cc: Catalin Marinas , linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , Jeremy Linton , Jonathan Cameron , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Sudeep Holla , Steven Price , Suzuki K Poulose , Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus Message-ID: References: <20260805063255.1638614-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 03:05:08PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Aneesh Kumar K.V writes: > > > Catalin Marinas writes: > > > >> On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 12:02:48PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote: > >>> Changes from v8: > >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260707081351.1680209-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org > >>> * Rebase onto the arm64 for-next/core branch. > >> > >> Was there a dependency on anything in for-next/core? We normally apply > >> series on their own branch on top of the vanilla kernel (e.g. 7.2-rc3) > >> and merge everything together in for-next/core. We (and many other > >> maintainers) strongly prefer series posted on top of an -rc kernel > >> (typically -rc1 to -rc3) unless there's a dependency on a different > >> branch. Never based on -next or -next like branches (which is what > >> for-next/core is, as the name implies). > >> > > > > The reason is that these two patches create conflicts. Since this series > > involves file movement, resolving those conflicts was not > > straightforward. Therefore, I rebased the series on top of both of the > > following commits: > > > > commit 24f55f511b9e ("virt: arm-cca-guest: use migrate_disable() for attestation token requests") > > commit e62decaf98e7 ("arm64/coco: Add pKVM as a CC platform") > > > > Any chance of getting this picked up for the next merge window? No, we're at -rc7 and you sent this half-way through -rc6. Regression fixes only at this point, I'm afraid. Will