From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@kernel.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Andrey Skvortsov <andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: fix usage_count leak when autosuspend_delay is negative
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 11:22:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aoQkQAxADxBQXNeH@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260808062029.2597581-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
On Sat, Aug 08, 2026 at 02:20:29PM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> sunxi_rsb_probe() calls pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(), but
> sunxi_rsb_remove() does not call the matching
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() before disabling runtime PM.
>
> If the autosuspend delay is set to a negative value while autosuspend
> is enabled, the runtime PM core increments usage_count to prevent
> runtime suspend. Without calling pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend()
> during driver teardown, this reference is not dropped and usage_count
> remains unbalanced.
As I've explained elsewhere, this is just misleading. There is no usage
count leak here as the count is balanced whenever the user re-enables
autosuspend through sysfs (by writing a non-negative timeout).
Drivers should clean up after themselves and disable autosuspend, but
this is more of a clean up than a fix and should not be backported.
You've sent upwards of 60 of these in the matter of just a few days,
some of which have even been picked up. Please send follow-ups (replies
or v2s) as soon as possible to prevent further of these from getting
merged.
> Add the missing pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() call before disabling
> runtime PM.
>
> This issue was found by manual code inspection.
>
> Fixes: 4a0dbc12e618 ("bus: sunxi-rsb: Implement runtime power management")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Johan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 6:20 [PATCH] bus: sunxi-rsb: fix usage_count leak when autosuspend_delay is negative Guangshuo Li
2026-08-18 9:22 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aoQkQAxADxBQXNeH@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=andrej.skvortzov@gmail.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wens@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox