From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] arm64: Move overflow sp into SP_EL1 and kernel sp into SP_EL0
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 12:29:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqFDFYECDl15R_39@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40954731-a235-4877-b615-7a3f66f1b039@arm.com>
Hi Vladimir,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 11:39:24AM +0100, Vladimir Murzin wrote:
> On 9/7/26 17:42, Will Deacon wrote:
> > This series is a bit of a complicated juggling act that, on its own,
> > doesn't achieve an awful lot. However, it lays the ground work for
> > sizing the kernel stack at runtime, e.g. via a cmdline option or even
> > potentially on a per-task basis and so I would like to work towards
> > getting it merged independently.
[...]
> I gave it a try and I observe splat:
Thanks for taking it for a spin!
> Unable to handle kernel execute from non-executable memory at virtual address ffff000970e81148
> Mem abort info:
> ESR = 0x000000008600000f
> EC = 0x21: IABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
> SET = 0, FnV = 0
> EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> FSC = 0x0f: level 3 permission fault
> swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=000000008129f000
> [ffff000970e81148] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=18000009f1dff403, pud=18000009f1079403, pmd=18000009f0ef1403, pte=00e80009f0e81707
> Internal error: Oops: 000000008600000f [#1] SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 7.3.0-rc2-7fb054f87+ #3627 PREEMPT(lazy)
> Hardware name: Generated (DT)
> pstate: 1634023c9 (nZCv DAIF +ALLINT +PAN -UAO +TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
> pc : 0xffff000970e81148
> lr : 0xffff000970e81148
> sp : ffff000970e81150
> x29: ffff800080f85fc0 x28: 0000000000000001 x27: 0000000000002000
> x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 00000000000000c0 x24: 0000000040000023
> x23: ffff800080c0e1d8 x22: 00000000000003c0 x21: ffff800080b58300
> x20: cfa2800080b58300 x19: 00000000200003c0 x18: 0000000000000000
> x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000028
> x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff8000814f3ac0 x12: ffff8008efcac000
> x11: b2000c3eb474d99d x10: 0000000000000008 x9 : 0000000000001000
> x8 : ffff800080010800 x7 : 055001f2b5503510 x6 : 0000000001310000
> x5 : 0000000000000000 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : ffff800081502d80
> x2 : 0000000000000802 x1 : ffff000800106a70 x0 : 0000000000000001
> Call trace:
> 0xffff000970e81148 (P)
> Code: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 (00000002)
> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception
> SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> Kernel Offset: disabled
> CPU features: 0x0,00000000,034bfc7d,ff728b42,7ffce667
> Memory Limit: none
> ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Oops: Fatal exception ]---
>
> I suspect it is related to power management, since it can be triggered
> with the sleep command, though I haven't debugged it. I noticed that
> Sashiko has reported issues related to suspend/resume, so if you
> provide fixups for the relevant commits, I can give them another
> try. Otherwise, I'll wait for v2 :)
It's fiddly to envisage how we end up trying to execute from non-executable
memory, but there are two bugs in the suspend/resume code:
1. I don't save/restore the stack pointers correctly (I suppose this could
explain almost any crash, tbh)
2. I don't restore the pauth keys properly
I've hacked up an untested diff below, please can you take it for a spin?
Cheers,
Will
--->8
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
index f093cdf71be1..facf3f1cc3b1 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sleep.S
@@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(_cpu_resume)
add x0, x0, #SLEEP_STACK_DATA_SYSTEM_REGS
/* load sp from context */
ldr x2, [x0, #CPU_CTX_SP]
- mov sp, x2
+ msr sp_el0, x2
+
/*
* cpu_do_resume expects x0 to contain context address pointer
*/
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
index 0811fa569100..bec7f858fae9 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
* This must be kept in sync with struct cpu_suspend_ctx in <asm/suspend.h>.
*/
SYM_FUNC_START(cpu_do_suspend)
+ msr spsel, #1
mrs x2, tpidr_el0
mrs x3, tpidrro_el0
mrs x4, contextidr_el1
@@ -98,8 +99,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(cpu_do_suspend)
mrs x10, oslsr_el1
mrs x11, sctlr_el1
get_this_cpu_offset x12
- msr spsel, #1
- mrs x13, sp_el0
+ mov x13, sp // SP_EL1
stp x2, x3, [x0]
stp x4, x5, [x0, #16]
stp x6, x7, [x0, #32]
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_TCR2
mrs x2, REG_TCR2_EL1
str x2, [x0, #104]
alternative_else_nop_endif
+ msr spsel, #0
ret
SYM_FUNC_END(cpu_do_suspend)
@@ -122,6 +123,8 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(cpu_do_suspend)
* cpu_do_resume - restore CPU register context
*
* x0: Address of context pointer
+ *
+ * Entered with SPSel == 1, returns with SPSel == 0.
*/
SYM_FUNC_START(cpu_do_resume)
ldp x2, x3, [x0]
@@ -130,6 +133,10 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(cpu_do_resume)
ldp x9, x10, [x0, #48]
ldp x11, x12, [x0, #64]
ldp x13, x14, [x0, #80]
+
+ /* Move 'current' somewhere safe */
+ mov x15, x3
+
/*
* Restore x18, as it may be used as a platform register, and clear
* the buffer to minimize the risk of exposure when used for shadow
@@ -156,8 +163,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
msr sctlr_el1, x12
set_this_cpu_offset x13
- msr sp_el0, x14
- msr spsel, #0
+ mov sp, x14 // SP_EL1
/*
* Restore oslsr_el1 by writing oslar_el1
@@ -179,8 +185,9 @@ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING
alternative_else_nop_endif
#endif
- ptrauth_keys_install_kernel_nosync x14, x1, x2, x3
+ ptrauth_keys_install_kernel_nosync x15, x1, x2, x3
isb
+ msr spsel, #0
ret
SYM_FUNC_END(cpu_do_resume)
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 16:42 [PATCH 00/21] arm64: Move overflow sp into SP_EL1 and kernel sp into SP_EL0 Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 01/21] arm64: entry: Defer setting of TPIDRRO_EL0 until exit to userspace Will Deacon
2026-09-11 7:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 02/21] arm64: entry: Only check for stack overflow on exceptions from EL1 Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 03/21] arm64: stackprotector: Temporarily disable per-task stackprotector Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 04/21] arm64: bpf: Add support for generating reads of TPIDRRO_EL0 Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 05/21] KVM: arm64: Protect TPIDRRO_EL0 across guest entry/exit Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 06/21] arm64: Store 'current' in TPIDRRO_EL0 instead of SP_EL0 Will Deacon
2026-09-08 13:19 ` David Laight
2026-09-11 12:57 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 07/21] selftests/bpf: arm64: Use TPIDRRO_EL0 instead of SP_EL0 for 'current' Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 08/21] scripts/gdb: " Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 09/21] arm64: stackprotector: Re-enable per-task stackprotector Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 10/21] arm64: percpu: Specialise set_my_cpu_offset() for the primary CPU Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 11/21] arm64: percpu: Annotate __kern_my_cpu_offset() as '__always_inline' Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 12/21] KVM: arm64: Preserve handler/thread bit of EL1 mode in __finalise_el2() Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 13/21] arm64: sdei: Guard most of asm/sdei.h with CONFIG_ARM_SDE_INTERFACE Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 14/21] arm64: sdei: Support SDEI events from kernel handler and thread modes Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 15/21] arm64: entry: Point SP_EL0 at the overflow stack Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 16/21] arm64: entry: Implement EL1t exception handlers for " Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 17/21] arm64: entry: Use SPSel to switch to " Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 18/21] arm64: entry: Split up kernel_ventry macro into separate helper macros Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 19/21] arm64: entry: The great stack switcheroo Will Deacon
2026-09-08 11:30 ` Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 20/21] arm64: tracing: Advertise a mode of EL1t in synthetic kernel regs Will Deacon
2026-09-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 21/21] arm64: Rename 'overflow_stack' and OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE Will Deacon
2026-09-09 10:39 ` [PATCH 00/21] arm64: Move overflow sp into SP_EL1 and kernel sp into SP_EL0 Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-09 11:29 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2026-09-10 13:49 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-09-11 12:57 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqFDFYECDl15R_39@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=vladimir.murzin@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox