From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@kernel.org>,
Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: st_fdma: fix potential use-after-free in vchan tasklets
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 10:40:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqgVgZhsP6OQ0QvT@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260912154629.1021632-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 12, 2026 at 11:46:29PM +0800, Guangshuo Li wrote:
> st_fdma_probe() allocates the channel array with devm_kcalloc() and
> initializes an embedded virt-dma tasklet for each st_fdma_chan through
> vchan_init().
>
> The interrupt handler calls vchan_cookie_complete() or
> vchan_cyclic_callback(), which may schedule the tasklet. However,
> st_fdma_remove() only frees the IRQ and does not kill already scheduled
> tasklets.
>
> devm_free_irq() prevents new interrupt handlers from running and waits
> for an in-flight handler to finish, but it does not flush a tasklet
> that was scheduled by a previous interrupt. Since fdev->chans is
> devm-managed, the channel array is released after the remove callback
> returns.
>
> This leaves the following possible race:
>
> CPU0 (driver removal) CPU1 (IRQ / softirq)
> --------------------- --------------------
> st_fdma_irq_handler()
> vchan_cookie_complete()
> tasklet_schedule()
> return
> <tasklet pending>
>
> st_fdma_remove()
> devm_free_irq()
> ...
> return
>
> devres cleanup
> ...
> kfree(fdev->chans) // FREE
> vchan_complete()
> vc = from_tasklet(...)
> spin_lock_irq(&vc->lock)
> // USE -> UAF
>
> The pending tasklet is embedded in the devm-allocated st_fdma_chan.
> Once fdev->chans is released, the tasklet and the virt_dma_chan
> containing it point into freed memory. A later vchan_complete() can
> therefore dereference the freed channel and cause a potential
> use-after-free.
>
> Kill all vchan tasklets after freeing the IRQ. This prevents new
> interrupt handlers from scheduling them and waits for any tasklet that
> is already pending or running before the channel storage can be
> released.
>
> This issue was found by manual code inspection.
>
> Fixes: 6b4cd727eaf15 ("dmaengine: st_fdma: Add STMicroelectronics FDMA engine driver support")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
> ---
I prefer defer all tasklet tear down fix patches after
https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/5ae73ce5-1216-4012-abe0-aba9469ef089@deltatee.com/
Frank
> drivers/dma/st_fdma.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
> index d9547017f3bd..23071cbf1866 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/st_fdma.c
> @@ -846,8 +846,13 @@ static int st_fdma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static void st_fdma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct st_fdma_dev *fdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + int i;
>
> devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, fdev->irq, fdev);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < fdev->nr_channels; i++)
> + tasklet_kill(&fdev->chans[i].vchan.task);
> +
> st_slim_rproc_put(fdev->slim_rproc);
> of_dma_controller_free(pdev->dev.of_node);
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-12 15:46 [PATCH] dmaengine: st_fdma: fix potential use-after-free in vchan tasklets Guangshuo Li
2026-09-14 15:40 ` Frank Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqgVgZhsP6OQ0QvT@SMW015318 \
--to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.barre@st.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox