From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47C9C88E75 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:49:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=kZzsGaXPUVqWdbiJlm0sqmPG8X19xHFYaAJPDTPlT8A=; b=txfrSvZReCiNiE8SBJ9RIL7cRf IAQVdUU7FW6PN3Msr1dPIcHVp4AELxCwszQ/GYcyeo96ZsYjEuOGCaMNavv5HmPipXKjC8ybxRZ5v SBHzknHT6NdBL2R54JmeLCZK8guwRQA6eJe1MrbabzkPb+J3JXyjN7MgvEbOrClS+HAoBcemiyUrB sfcPXloDBYS4Ppp0UVspcBjikD3S37AGjClaWVjTMCMg20+bkxMZfTiYxLsyG2CKbojHTURefH9dX M1m7JBJm52+JngIiSm6pgUsz3uDLntL8Px0qoQ3agCEDG2pLsSoFjE5UTOcP7hZ6FO6q8tisHSLRj sLx1ldBQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x6bxn-000000082Yd-3qUJ; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:49:19 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1x6bxl-000000082YV-3eKP for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:49:17 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364C260008; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7DC31F000FF; Tue, 15 Sep 2026 22:49:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789512556; bh=kZzsGaXPUVqWdbiJlm0sqmPG8X19xHFYaAJPDTPlT8A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=FpiSvfNsjtOquI9DAMwpgwxVSzGM0L4KGw3+pi75m44IuyDlheeQQIl1+YMvU9oFQ AbAdF1z1neMsu20+Cn89GlfetfTJNG6KskbLbYv6g9hFfElcfrjntm+dBC0GUSbbTj JG6H4DK7Hfom1M7NsWMP8Prhjk2OdKvC39flf+OkUHVpSTKq7djpYOapPadN5IIAcx RGR5l84P/9GoEiQsdexAwg7wccAeY8+B1QPAP3lmms1vMOb4SV7xboNBz1kb9fkGFH e4FBNL/+nhZsr6j4HOfJeYxLWTAEQownhFAJAx5t6pd5ZuWyVsA8PX7hx21cv9sZlA UyV9uuhTWBXNg== Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 15:49:15 -0700 From: Oliver Upton To: Wei-Lin Chang Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier , Fuad Tabba , Joey Gouly , Steffen Eiden , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Itaru Kitayama , Wang Han , Shuai Xue , "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement nested stage-2 reverse map Message-ID: References: <20260915154305.3852871-1-weilin.chang@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260915154305.3852871-1-weilin.chang@arm.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 15, 2026 at 04:42:58PM +0100, Wei-Lin Chang wrote: > Hi, > > This is v6 of optimizing the shadow s2 mmu unmapping during MMU > notifiers. > > This version fixes a few issues, and adds Marc's space optimization > for kvm_guest_s2_mapping [1]. Please see the changelog for the details. > > Tested by booting L3, and running in-kernel targetted tests described > in [2]. v5 got some tested-by's from Itaru and Wang (thanks), I didn't > carry them over since some bugs fixed in v6 are non-obvious. Some > retest would be much appreciated! > > Series based on v7.3-rc3 + Marc's nested mmu lifecycle fixes [3]. Looking pretty good to me, thanks Wei-Lin! Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton Thanks, Oliver