From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E913DCA5FD4 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:18:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=EFvCrRBIWF5b7VjJlzEl/8QN+53YJGJq2xeX3a/6Rg4=; b=ocqg5VGKJWuddet43szHI5gfyS IsT9abMuPW4o06Bf/DBTQ2l6AYPqd37sKP8vW+HDAdvOgln3VCQp7dhN+GiN9zwFpoDIJ0vST8Cht hUCBMK8XepqKiaAbcE6GgrcCUMW88X5yN6xO1xufGwRr6X15dwE5WcNxFi6QCoWgjyQ8D+U1A5Xv3 8QpBdTdjW9UoMCweCbIiYa9nxdsFFveIfpjFM+AdwUd/QlS5YMjo0FyTGBU5repT/yBS7FJcofFJe YTFnjz1o0QUgv9oagby00OPQnXyJcFIPyGyPiapYnF5lD8f9cYbeNceGaZFQpPUTk746d1mhpD4yP rT/wwClg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xCaLY-0000000BHrX-0iUw; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:18:32 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c0a:e001:78e:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xCaLU-0000000BHr4-44om for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:18:28 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D9842A5B; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 678BC1F000FF; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 10:18:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790936308; bh=EFvCrRBIWF5b7VjJlzEl/8QN+53YJGJq2xeX3a/6Rg4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=dO0QF7Fy9SVQ3Fa+3btBoie+pDM8Lk1+P79E8N59Q1N4IH9/niZ/8pXqQp02wWRIR N76lMDD2MAON/2AcdCkav+7m03E7uXn8HvN7EMymSxBB167Fny+no+8iBoDnHQG2vX FHO264uotXxe9vgawMJBX5THTKcXj3pDtbdSD+QW05kEP+XMADvBf5ngIP0JQR4yXf jeZj/9IOUm/NrsSHNjBwCQaJfbiZ8ttVXj2WX4djoX9UzrvuCaQju70PQofstqfd2I kSJ+ymDKob9aZKysEpcibgHoMz5AQ2XWO8DC4CPqMOyW2BqOnfd7JHx4MB9yXaJjU/ M651mDE9LyZyA== Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:18:18 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: Steffen Eiden Cc: Arnd Bergmann , kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev , Andreas Grapentin , Catalin Marinas , Christian Borntraeger , Claudio Imbrenda , "David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)" , Friedrich Welter , Fuad Tabba , Gautam Gala , Hariharan Mari , Heiko Carstens , Hendrik Brueckner , Ilya Leoshkevich , Janosch Frank , Joey Gouly , Marc Zyngier , Nico Boehr , Nina Schoetterl-Glausch , Oliver Upton , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Suzuki K Poulose , Sven Schnelle , Ulrich Weigand , Vasily Gorbik , Will Deacon , Zenghui Yu Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 23/24] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Message-ID: References: <20260930173441.66762-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com> <20260930173441.66762-24-seiden@linux.ibm.com> <20261001153005.314717-B-seiden@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261001153005.314717-B-seiden@linux.ibm.com> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 05:30:05PM +0200, Steffen Eiden wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 03:36:26PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > Ah the s390 <-> kvm emulation stuff. > > no, its not emulation :) > We use a hardware based acclearaion approach. Sorry my apologies, I did know this but mr. brain didn't engage there :) rushing through mails (and been sick these last few days)... > > Or both conditions? One for the s390 guys. > > > so just the initialized test. OK cool, so Arnd's suggestion as-is, then. LGTM! -- Cheers, Lorenzo