From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37338CA5FD6 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:03:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=RQsB+ge38WH53pnancjKWGYXnOy7+uX3sDgWwo3cVOI=; b=Eytg4AjQbwWeXbDCY+giIWB6m6 4Zipgsjo6szjInm6W/f8mwkKi4jgo9Q2+APmhSlMrpq8Uk81Qn0GXK9WTiALuF8dqTW/VxAg+o+ju oI0pMnyKcmayrNmmm6bumhHMfysEUgPcXP2RCxquTNsODNS+5ONgaqmI9Iw7Ujo3ineNCWIzE3vJ+ cq78tvf9C4Y5kuMClSh7qHwbOrIfhJJ42p9kAi77EBvtMd5wG/i17QUOi7qQYMv5QnDmEhJIeFxnC XZeMK2ev7qnsdSzzZQDSgE+UKG41MnmH6aUQuN3tuDUiozh2nFcT8g1ObBl5VQCXYBQbaR0WP4rDx 0yjvuRcA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xCb3M-0000000BQEQ-3DxS; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 11:03:48 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xCb3J-0000000BQDX-34N3 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 11:03:47 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B252F; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 04:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0CB53F85F; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 04:03:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=arm.com; s=foss; t=1790939023; bh=VveSnYZ4hUEZzYAVLJFm+ZlfCp0ty6xGzWYSlkf7ChU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=YmhfkI/OD1wsPm44zabAN/XnWKsLo3drst6w219fnFnqdStfI9eJktiQ+vqKKoaSY oL42VlAgSxTo1LXxKgePhnKaFOxVVE7H2cQmdENnHIxOmISojXwENs6+QxLhtbKNe4 XzxruEpHJUV6zbvvNBGAfCJIVBhCJmGs6P+7CS1I= Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:03:36 +0100 From: Catalin Marinas To: Suzuki K Poulose , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, steven.price@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, gshan@redhat.com, joey.gouly@arm.com, tabba@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com, sdonthineni@nvidia.com, alpergun@google.com, fj0570is@fujitsu.com, WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, enju.kohei@fujitsu.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com, jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com, Len Brown , Pavel Machek , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 07/10] kernel: hibernate: Add an arch hook for preventing hiberation Message-ID: References: <20261002061507.1600269-1-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> <20261002061507.1600269-8-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20261002061507.1600269-8-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20261002_040346_079118_8318628C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.73 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 07:15:03AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > Add a hook to allow arch code disable hibernation. On arm64, with an RMM active, > there could be pages that are delegated to the "Realm" security state. Any > access to them are fatal (e.g., hibernate save image or restoring an image to > a delegated page). pKVM host also has its restrictions on enabling hibernation. > > Add a weak arch hook to let the architectures have a say. > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > Cc: Len Brown > Cc: Pavel Machek > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Sudeep Holla > Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose Nit: the subject prefix for kernel/power/ usually is PM: hibernate: .... I can fix it locally, no need to respin (and probably the wrap the long lines in the commit log, we tend to keep them shorter). > --- > include/linux/suspend.h | 1 + > kernel/power/hibernate.c | 8 +++++++- > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/suspend.h b/include/linux/suspend.h > index b02876f1ae38a..a3815027773c5 100644 > --- a/include/linux/suspend.h > +++ b/include/linux/suspend.h > @@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ int hibernate_quiet_exec(int (*func)(void *data), void *data); > int hibernate_resume_nonboot_cpu_disable(void); > int arch_hibernation_header_save(void *addr, unsigned int max_size); > int arch_hibernation_header_restore(void *addr); > +bool arch_hibernation_available(void); > > #else /* CONFIG_HIBERNATION */ > static inline void register_nosave_region(unsigned long b, unsigned long e) {} > diff --git a/kernel/power/hibernate.c b/kernel/power/hibernate.c > index d2479c69d71a4..9d9d53828542f 100644 > --- a/kernel/power/hibernate.c > +++ b/kernel/power/hibernate.c > @@ -106,11 +106,17 @@ bool hibernation_in_progress(void) > return !atomic_read(&hibernate_atomic); > } > > +__weak bool arch_hibernation_available(void) > +{ > + return true; > +} > + > bool hibernation_available(void) > { > return nohibernate == 0 && > !security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_HIBERNATION) && > - !secretmem_active() && !cxl_mem_active(); > + !secretmem_active() && !cxl_mem_active() && > + arch_hibernation_available(); Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas Raphael, any objection to this patch going in through the arm64 tree? It matches the style of other __weak functions in this file. Thanks. -- Catalin