From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE2D5CA5FD4 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:28:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=r3XSvVIqIJb9n/x3qaYL7kH0gfxPLdje2eVvkPwfr1I=; b=pvvuTxMGyzwWVi3aJSNwc8vN3W 0fYLk7R92dtlSQ/WNBNo0Z27+aEfB8mz5yqhGKDyuxzFgnRgD4BB4RDif3xUQWdDP88Ah5SABKGPt 7cfuiEGtJeXUu8hIVUQ+tCtovbN5AogQ1I9jaIw8/62WaZC39UGsHW5WPcVxupqS1A3VWm1XPLYvK x9M//cpFyBQZiIo+54LJ+ZVUwefEMeJ9zB+ZyilZqjapAMU7RGK7KxpmnTMCAJEniIVPT2Vbqdpoa kLrDCD+eUEIj/qynmqycpQ9JkfdL2wZMtqsDcs+lQ/+zHQuahh4wRniKfCzYesY6b8pWVNL+Burw9 gN3lHNug==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xCbQq-0000000BTTf-0XYY; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 11:28:04 +0000 Received: from sea.source.kernel.org ([172.234.252.31]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xCbQo-0000000BTTU-3Bun for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 02 Oct 2026 11:28:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by sea.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8FD409B8; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 488E91F000FF; Fri, 2 Oct 2026 11:27:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790940482; bh=r3XSvVIqIJb9n/x3qaYL7kH0gfxPLdje2eVvkPwfr1I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=nAYNTtyxSvEJWlBwMsuLcNL+tHeMYXYUfLPsAX1ucTE/y72zAPwEggidfF76fDiuw Kh+kphHP4rWdvz0VzThertJ6AM7Q18c8vkZQtWmoyMAPKyOPdxs/4OILFBZl/O8BVZ 9y/cD1gaXPdFeM5vv8wEKYA0GnzUMqJZ9tQYI4hlGD1wp5TB0GN52P8GZcBUjQXrP4 g6yqw6Ka9jpHj5CiKGiuxz4alEMWuwHFafNDDa/qwCm0NdVH70yl8xQjkfAhWmBks0 1J1PQJR6gukcWrNsBzOKVB1E8vOjMW45NxETR3F0WMvt4v6wrGpIaG1mm5PsprQ8fC JSyhpUqm8cW5A== Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 12:27:55 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Suzuki K Poulose , Shuah Khan , Oliver Upton , Fuad Tabba , Peter Maydell , Leonardo Bras , Wei-Lin Chang , Yao Yuan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 12/15] KVM: selftests: arm64: Add GCS to set_id_regs Message-ID: References: <20260930-arm64-gcs-v21-0-3556644cd927@kernel.org> <20260930-arm64-gcs-v21-12-3556644cd927@kernel.org> <8eb4d0f8-3080-4efa-afaf-bbe2a16eaa37@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8eb4d0f8-3080-4efa-afaf-bbe2a16eaa37@sirena.org.uk> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 07:14:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 05:38:54PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2026 at 10:48:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > Now that GCS is configurable via the ID registers update set_id_regs to > > > cover ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.GCS. > > > Should maybe also mention adding the GCS-without-S1PIE test? > > I'd have said that was part of the coverage the test now has for > bitfields TBH. Fair enough, all LGTM at any rate! :) -- Cheers, Lorenzo