From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21528CA5FA7 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8pzOtnEI9QGF7Q4KS7u8yKxdrrASgPpmPOvOAsDFo0U=; b=c7Cv+qws9kFRkVpoNCwWEeq9Ab 6G7e62Uh+aic2OJGWLy396b1cl+Jp6lZDBURiCLko76rffZu6/pi11dpT4CLzdFbKHRJ3/ZEuZgzB J9prYRvYmyZ4OAA4/3p53SJfp3uXB8oX+vvNUleQZahSdGR5KMg2Zwec3FzVv3mSkSd0GDTyG1D3o k6qzAAx92i4dyS37mPCCZ8WRK2KY0EoDIeo5dI9HgByL0JI51vcSdp4jIhfk8+9a8zch+oKGccbjP GFNAZWmHnxzsfabXJZop2kZVP0zRRVut7TLkg/gLF7DCvZyznWJ1QPAL9SREo+xfzWIqYsv0x5OsZ dCnHZzCw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBaN5-000000040r3-3kqA; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:07:59 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([172.105.4.254]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBaN4-000000040qq-1m2A for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:07:58 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961E36022C; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:07:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8582E1F000FF; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 16:07:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1790698077; bh=8pzOtnEI9QGF7Q4KS7u8yKxdrrASgPpmPOvOAsDFo0U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Iuj10jRjnyL5TZL08SdpWIdpltnEIv5kzNn3L9xHYBwB8CORDJyzHVaiJrsHcWhLB uKRHAB4I7btnc3Fua8+heVnjM9tQGAYNrrBrXZ0ns0M81AZwrKT23me9c7ESJ7hkrE 8I6DG4OeGYF/HxkV32fyzqbgB7cVyRhWjY/hotxkYRCaIcXG+L1RnkPH1K/yTDQ4l/ 9hU75SJfi5UgvsveZYmMm8LFb1GXACwDQtP42SIZYMnO/kEOaDEJGuXUpKQMNzS0wm 6NsVoK9PW76uHdTp7VTgSrafGVikUbcneXTyZigwUezktvjn2peOIV3vxYYkzxSd8C 3Uf+wlmPHDFtg== Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 17:07:51 +0100 From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Shuah Khan , Marc Zyngier , Oliver Upton , Fuad Tabba , Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] kselftest/arm64: Factor shared signal handlers out of fp-stress loads Message-ID: References: <20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-0-31bce995b49b@kernel.org> <20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-2-31bce995b49b@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-2-31bce995b49b@kernel.org> X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Sep 01, 2026 at 06:06:42PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Nice cleanup! Yikes at that duplication. Nit below but otherwise LGTM so: Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile > index 183e9d319b65..d92a755837ff 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/Makefile > -ASM_UTILS := $(OUTPUT)/asm-utils.o $(OUTPUT)/asm-utils-linux.o > +ASM_UTILS_LINUX := $(OUTPUT)/asm-utils.o $(OUTPUT)/asm-utils-linux.o NIT: I wonder if it's worth renaming this ASM_UTILS_LINUX in the previous patch to reduce the churn a bit? -- Cheers, Lorenzo